re: Yuk, Yuk
"it wouldn't pay to work for them, however excellent your performance is. "
I'd like to bounce that one off a few private businessmen that ARE turning a profit.
Space/Science » in reply to re: Ok, point taken, but...
The whole thread (24 posts)
- Human Spaceflight - a future without NASA?
- Comm on admit it--NASA is just cover for Bush & Rumsfield's plan to Militarize Space N/T (n/t)
- re: Human Spaceflight - a future without NASA?
- Congress says NASA *can* offer competitive prizes. Here's the official link documenting this...
- I didn't say they "couldn't" offer prizes. I said they "won't." (n/t)
- re: Privatization could increase the cost to launch
- There needs to be COMPETITION between entrepreneurial ventures, NOT merely between corrupt contractors like Boeing.
- re: I don't believe that
- re: I don't believe that
- Itys a long way between government regulation of homebuilders and haveing a Government Homebuilding Agency
- re: To add to my statement
- re: Boeing IS an entrepreneurial venture
- Huh? Boeing has lobbied AGAINST tax incentives, and COMPETITIVE prizes. It hired Ms. Druyun (a corrupt Air Force contracting official) before firing her last week, too.
- re: Boeing IS an entrepreneurial venture
- re: I don't believe that
- There needs to be COMPETITION between entrepreneurial ventures, NOT merely between corrupt contractors like Boeing.
- Congress says NASA *can* offer competitive prizes. Here's the official link documenting this...