TOM: "It goes without saying that one scenario that would satisfy all the inconsistencies is if Saddam did have WMD or production systems, lied about it like he had done for years, and successfully concealed or destroyed them in the month or so before we attacked. In fact, if you are objective at all, and take Saddam's history into account, this is the scenario that actually makes the most sense."

MY REPLY: Ridiculous, Tom. You don't destroy hundreds of tons of chemical and biological weapons in a month's time and escape one's notice or leave no traces - particularly at a time when you've got U.N. weapons inspectors crawling all over the country and U2 spy flights overhead. Your suggested scenario makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

You are grasping at straws to avoid realizing the inevitable...Saddam destroyed his WMDs years ago.