re: War?

gbaikie — 1/25/2004 10:00:23 AM (archived)

"At war? Against terrorism? Against Al Qaeda? But Iraq wasn't related to that! "

Don't be silly. It's well known that Saddam supported terrorists. And it's known that in the first attempt to blow up the Trade Center that there was a direct link to Saddam's regime. With 911 there is no firm evidence which links to Saddam's regime, but to suppose that that Iraq is not related to war on terror is just the wishful dreaming of the Left.
Even N Korea is related to war on terror- put that in your pipe and smoke it.

The whole thread (27 posts)

Powell: Possible Iraq Had No Banned Arms! - Donald - 1/24/2004 6:28:49 PM
- Don, he did not. You lied. Again. - ebnelson - 1/24/2004 11:12:27 PM
  - Uh...Ed - Donald - 1/25/2004 4:13:56 AM
    - If you don't want credit, use quotes (n/t) - ebnelson - 1/25/2004 5:11:17 AM
    - Again, the headline was quite a stretch from "we don't know yet." (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 4:22:50 AM
- Getting an awful lot of mileage out of "we don't know yet." - Tom Brosz - 1/24/2004 9:35:41 PM
  - re: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Raoul - 1/24/2004 10:35:27 PM
    - Speaking of extraordinary claims - S - 1/25/2004 2:32:39 AM
    - re: Extraordinary claims - Tom Brosz - 1/24/2004 11:58:31 PM
      - re: Extraordinary claims - Raoul - 1/25/2004 6:58:21 AM
      - "Saddam must go" - S - 1/25/2004 2:19:57 AM
        
        BTW, we were already at war, so 'no war' is a non-starter - ebnelson - 1/25/2004 5:15:54 AM
        
        re: War? - Raoul - 1/25/2004 7:43:29 AM
        
        >sigh< Inspite of French and German breach of the ceasefire agreements, and Iraqi non-compliance, - ebnelson - 1/25/2004 8:12:14 PM
        
        re: War? - gbaikie - 1/25/2004 10:00:23 AM
        
        re: War? - Raoul - 1/25/2004 10:30:38 AM
        
        Interesting article... - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 10:43:57 AM
        
        How much more time? A month, a year, a decade? - ebnelson - 1/25/2004 5:13:43 AM
        
        re: "Saddam must go" - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 3:39:47 AM
        
        re: US safety - Raoul - 1/25/2004 7:55:50 AM
        
        We were not the ones who beleived nuetrality would keep the Germans out (n/t) - ebnelson - 1/25/2004 10:44:41 PM
        
        re: US safety - Tom Brosz - 1/25/2004 9:43:00 AM
        
        The whole issue is a red herring - ebnelson - 1/25/2004 10:47:58 PM
        
        re: US safety - Raoul - 1/25/2004 10:24:54 AM
        
        why war - Odin - 1/26/2004 3:34:07 AM
- re: Powell: Possible Iraq Had No Banned Arms! - gbaikie - 1/24/2004 8:00:45 PM
  - Don doesn't need stinkin' facts - ebnelson - 1/24/2004 11:18:22 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (27 posts)