Over the years I've answered all these questions and entered into very specific scientific principles to explain my beliefs. Robert's server's hard drives have all this information encoded in binary data. A search for "SDAI" and "wave" would bring forth and unlock all sorts of wondrous little secrets encoded therein. All of the answers have at their root, the nature of the simple sine wave. The universe is infinitely complex and at the same time, infinitely simple.

Karma implies the moral aspect. It's so much more complicated than that. You're right, the collective universe doesn't make moral judgment calls. In fact the infinite universe is completely removed from judgment of any kind. It's always expressing perfect equilibrium: expansion/contraction, life/death and action/reaction.

Morality is really an elementary version of a forming constructive consciousness. Good and evil are tools to learn and grow. Morality is never static. In theory, as we learn and develop, our morals must shift. A society that would burn Janet Jackson at the stake, for revealing her bosom in a suggestive song, in the 1600's now can laugh and make jokes at the same event.

Morality is a tool. Eventually one will outgrow it. Each event, each action we partake of has a specific frequency and oscillation within our consciousness. It is unique to our own development. In the future mankind tries to moderate their actions based upon each action and its own relationship to his/her progressive development.

That one concept is the a very important concept. All the struggling with morality and laws really can be understood from this key issue. We do not judge an aborigine for not understanding why killing an endangered species is wrong, but we expect this from the western game hunter. We judge each era according to its own level of development and can excuse the church its inquisition as a folly from another era of backwards ignorance.

However, the infinite universe is made a bit differently. It forgets nothing. All events are recorded in energy. All dimensions and spectra are composed of energy existing within certain frequency wave forms. Each event therefore will be etched with specific wave trains, harmonic affiliations and so forth.

For a prehistoric man to evolve into the man of today required an endless chain of individual and collective experiences. Learning of life, death and reproduction spawned a whole bunch of thoughts and feelings on these things. Survival became the most important thing. Killing was not evil and did not have any "moral" issues at all to deal with. These men and women began to band together and the first moral codes appeared. Survival of the clan required certain rules. Food was shared. Men worked together to hunt. The women and children were protected from neighboring tribes. Any of these prehistoric men of this era could very easily kill other men and other children that were not from his tribe. Killing was not "evil" to these more primitive minds.

In short order, pagan gods appeared and whole religious frameworks to explain the mysteries of nature and life. The rain, sun, moon and earth were all inhabited by spirits or controlled by some deities. When inter-clan bloodshed threatened to make the tribe weak and threatened its survival in the competitive world, that is when killing became evil. Is killing evil? To an evolved consciousness - it definitely is. Yet, how does the impersonal infinite universe regard this killing of another?

Each individual has a consciousness. This consciousness is a quantized field of energy and it is etched and shaped by both our thoughts and actions. It is an intangible hard drive. It forgets nothing but only keeps adding data to the previous record. Our morality is based upon its latest configuration.

For the latter twentieth century, the gassing of the Jews has stood as a sort of moral landmark. Yet by no means is their massacre the only massacre of the twentieth century. More died in gulags and mass executions under Stalin's systematic purgings of the Soviet empire. Yet how exactly does either of these events stand in a scientific manner?

What we discover under close examination is that each individual involved in such an event has a unique perspective. Killing a fly is not considered a crime and yet killing a man is a terrible crime. Clearly killing things alone wasn't the only issue, rather killing others of your own kind was.

So clan could war against clan, nation against nation and race against race. Differences justified killing. Each side could point out differences and say their side was superior and favored by their various deities.

The Jews were different, they could be persecuted and stereotyped. They believed in a different god and had strange rituals. For centuries various nations used these differences in both appearance and culture to justify pogroms and persecutions. The favored religion generally was glad to be rid of any competition for the people's money and political clout.

Now let's get back to the point...you ask did the Jews deserve to be tortured and killed? No one deserves to be tortured and killed. However, each person, depending upon their own past actions and involvement in past violence have a lot of wave forms stored in this quantized field. This field is sort of like an old fashioned record - it plays the same tune again and again changing ever so slightly with each playing. Being tortured or killed doesn't automatically mean you have to have killed or tortured others. There are many ways that could lead to this sort of harmonic affiliation with torture or killing.

For example if during the inquisition, I didn't speak up when someone is taken away unjustly and that person is tortured on the rack, there will likely be repercussions. Whenever one denies one's better instincts one attract situations that help us better to learn these things so that we will not deny them in the future. Being taken away and tortured while others stand by and do nothing would be one manner in which this feedback might manifest. After this experience one will likely never idly standby when someone is unjustly persecuted. One will not hold one's tongue just to save it. In the back of one's mind one realizes that holding your tongue does not save you and one will speak out with vehemence. In this sense torture and death can be turned from a great negative to a positive - when seen in this perspective by a continually developing consciousness.

Now how did that torture and murder come about? Was it a god who doles out the lessons? Was it some cosmic overseer? Not at all. It was the individual's own consciousness and these stored wave forms from this past experience that attracted this counterbalancing set of waveforms. (in the form of an experience)

Now this is just an example. It is very possible that you could recieve this sort of feedback from a vast number of other circumstances. Befriending the wrong people, learning to stand up for ones beliefs, being hyperciritical and angry, being callous and indifferent to others suffering, being cruel or even the belief that you or your people are superior will attract situations where one can learn the fallaciousness and danger of holding such a view.

I could tell you much more, about how in the future man not only sees these things as they are unemotionally (without rage, anger or violent sorrow) but that these events are nullified in their making - by realizing that everything that ever happens to us is our own personal responsibility and no one elses.

Scientifically it comes down to the waveform again. I gave these links out to Betsy awhile back and I will share them again. They help familiarize oneself with properties of waveforms. When one applies this wave science to consciousness - one sees how moral interpretations are simply interpretive guesses at what choices and actions will help to continue our progress and step up our fundamental frequency or which lower frequency actions will bring down our fundamental frequency.

Natural or Fundamental Frequency

Wave relationships and interference

Here is an animation of 2-pt interference

Our consciousness is constantly interfacing with the material world around us based upon frequency relationship. Our eyes interpret waveforms of energy we call light. Our ears interpret waves we call sound. And the vibrations perceived and sent by our nervous system to our brains and our consciousness give us our ability to touch. All these wave-based packets of data are recombined by our consciousness into some semblance of order. The data is stored perfectly, based upon its actual wave form frequency and yet it also records these subharmonic signals from all the waves it is intertwined with through harmonic affiliation. We can be reminded of some past even just by thinking about something else. An old home as a signal can be intertwined with trillions of other signals and our consciousness can put the needle of the conscious mind on those past recorded signals and replay them.

So who is the most evil? Hitler, who gave the order to kill Jews or the person who pulls the lever to drop the cyanide tablets? What about the clerk who filed the paperwork? And the ditch digger who helped to bury the victims? As we can see each will have a certain amount of feedback form their participation. Evil and good are really relative and each individual is judged by their own existing personal development.

Was their action progeressive? Did they build their consciousness and understanding with their action? In essence, did their actions lead to their eovolving or did they lead to retrogression and degenerative dissipation of existing structures?

One of the things one realizes with a wave-based universe is that each action is only so intelligent - it can always be stepped up to higher frequency (which carries more data) and so the past is always negative in relationship to the present.

Yesterday's actions are today's mistakes or ommisions. This doesn't mean they weren't ok or even constructive and positive at the time - it just means that in a progressive, expanding universe yesterday's understandings and beliefs are stagnated and retrogressive. The middle east is a great example of how archaic views and beliefs lead to cultural and societal retrogression. Progress demands we move forward. When we cling to the old we cling to the incomplete and fallacious. Gods and deities should have been obsolete a thousand years ago. The renaissance and the great minds that appeared during it, did their best to show the scientific nature of the universe and free the masses from centuries of superstition and ignorance.

However as long as death is feared and the afterlife is an unknown variable, there will be religions. Salvation, intercession, damnation, etc are all the tools of the unscientific to attempt to explain what is a very scientific event. Death of the body does not mean death of the quantized field of data known as consciousness. In fact, quantized data and thought exists at light speed frequencies and as a result this field is much like a cosmic ray hurtling through space, unhindered by planets or stars and passes thorough these unmolested and intact.

Ironically this immortality is a birthright. All energy is immortal - both unending and infinite. The only way we can "die" over time is by repetitive acts on a retrogressive path. The Hitler's of the world and the Saddam's are well on their way down this destructive spiral. However they too have the opportunity to check their fall and build constructively again.

We are all on this learning path.

Morality is not a code it is a frequency! Each act exists with a relative signal within our own consciousness. If that act's frequency is higher than our consciounsness' fundamental frequency - we will evolve. If it is lower - we will retrogress!

This is what science has let religion handle for too long. When people are developed enough to understand these things, religions will finally become obsolete. When technology can accurately record and imprint human thoughts and rate signals frequencies a whole new "morality" will ensue. No longer will one be able to lie to oneself and say something is "not so bad" or "he had it coming". Even thinking negative thoughts about someone incurs feedback. Thoughts and actions are both recorded and will set up nasty harmonic affiliations if one does not monitor one's mind.

You asked and so I was obliged to give you the two dollar version of the scientific origin of my "belief system". It would be a lot easier if one had all the others posts to reference though, so as to round it out as it regards all sorts of details including cosmology, etc.

SDAI-Tech1

PS Congrats on being one of winners of Frank's "5 most annoying HZ members" poll from the flame board. With these "annoying" dissertations I thought I surely had one of those position's locked. This data is hard to focus on because the information it contains exists in that frequency threshold just outside what most are familiar with or oscillate with in their daily day to day activities. So in some ways these type of posts are like a sound just outside our audible spectrum - and can create an irritation. So if you're irritated - now you'll know why. Even as I type and post them I am aware of the difficulty of following the message. This stuff is on the consciousness' periphery spectra for me as well - and it seems a relief to lower one's frequency and think about something real simple, like a nice dish of Haagen-Daz chocolate chip cookie dough ice cream.

;-)