So if a soul is a murderous bastard one lifetime and the victim the next- then is the cycle over?

Must the killer be killed 1, 10, 20 or 100 times before his Karmic debt is repaid?

When did the cycle start?

If this is an evolutionary process are "new" souls inherently evil?

Or is it all "exhaust" like Tom says. Is there nothing more to this world than our five senses allow us?

The cycle is only over when the signal is put out of phase by a 180 shift. So the crucial moments in life are actually our toughest ones. How we handle them is crucial to our development. When we can confront a mugger without hate and hand them our wallets without biasing them - then we have mastered that encounter.

The killer must confront their attacker with a positive attitude - this doesn't mean lay down and die with a smile, far from it. It means you must try to neutralize the situation and your magnetics with it ASAP! Once one realizes things are going bad - it's time for some serious positive attituding.

This can cancel the magnetics and give one time to address the imbalanced wave form (because no wave exists in a vacuum usually it is many intertwined waves that are imbalanced!)

This why a soldier must be completely impersonal. While there will still be a certain amount of feedback - it is vastly diminished if you do not hate your opponent or enemy. Like survival rates for cancer patients - surviving a war demands mega-positive attitude.

When did the cycle start? Another good question. It's that heterodyning bit again. Evolution creates circumstances which can lead to various actions. The murderer didn't wake up one day and suddenly have a killer instinct. It was formed by previous conflicts that have degenerated into greater and greater conflicts. It may start with something as simple as a friendship gone sour. Hate as an emotion usually requires more personal interaction. It is hard to hate someone one doesn't know.

All drastic situations were created by degenerating harmonics. Each subsequent heterodyning and harmonizing just increased the amplitude of the discordant signal. Like a pea becoming a snowball - no one spots the rolling pea until it is usually already fairly large. However when we have these scientific principles at our personal disposal - we can catch these peas early, when it is so much easier to do so.

Positive action is not just a good idea - it is what evolution is all about.

If this is an evolutionary process are "new" souls inherently evil?

Not evil - ignorant. Evil implies they know better and choose a degenerative path. Humanity is all across the development spectrum. We gather around those close to our own level but we are well aware that the values and understandings we may hold dear are not universal.

Evil also implies that the universe condemns the murderer or the evildoer - it does not.

The evildoers condemn themselves by their actions. They learn of their evil as they grow. Here again is the origin for the distorted religious concept "conceived in sin" - what someone was really trying to explain was this inherent ignorance in all mankind (aka evil from another perspective).

Yet the infinite universe is balanced. Each evil action has to have an equal good!

Look at what we admire? We admire folks who fight evil, do good. Their positive action requires an evil to defeat. The strength to conquer addiction could never be achieved if there was no addiction in the first place. So in these things we can see this complex duality.

We can see how people keep evolving and learning from both thought and deed. Some concepts we can learn about, read about - yet they can't be fully realized unless we use them in action. We can agree with being positive in theory but then groan and moan at the next opportunity about our misfortunes. We can talk about meeting adversity with a smile, but this, too, takes practice.

Or is it all "exhaust" like Tom says. Is there nothing more to this world than our five senses allow us?

Tom is entitled to his opinion. The closer we analyze our five senses and the world around us - all these things I discuss become clearer. That your wife has come to these same conclusions is great. However, knowing the science behind them is very important and can give one the necessary tools to continue on in one's exploration of the unknown.

"Karma" as understood by the Hindu or Buddhist is woefully incomplete and inexact. Knowing these wave principles and by applying fourier analysis to the waves formed by our consciousness and the world around us we can see the complexity of thoughts, actions and our daily lives. With these tools man can easily extricate himself from the deepest pit. Even a Hitler or Saddam could salvage their futures with great, great effort and application.

The stigma of religion taints the concept of feedback and karma just as surely as the region of Cydonia is forever tainted by the association of the cydonauts. It keeps serious researchers away from the topic and almost immediately sets up a barrier to furthering our knowledge of the mind and its interaction with the world around us.

SDAI-Tech1