If you are going to dismiss the evidence in the links Bowser posted, then one would hope you might present a logical argument for doing so. I see none, merely your arbitrary label of this material as "preposturous (sic) claims."
Is it the Bush adminstation's sterling record of credibility that makes it so difficult for you to accept the idea that it might attempt to stage-manage - or take credit for - Saddam's capture?
What hurts the Democratic cause most of all is partisan infighting. Before you rush to demonize the "Bowsers of the world," you better be darn certain you're not attacking the messenger and playing into the Republican strategy of divide and conquer.
I see Bowser has presented several citations to support his argument. I see you have presented precisely none to support yours, only a thinly veiled ad hominem attack.
S
Current Events » in reply to "What the hell is wrong with the Democrats that they are willing to resort to whatever slander they can find with the remotest shred of evidence?"
The Buck Galaxys of the world
The whole thread (37 posts)
- Saddam Catchers Hunt Bin Laden . . .
- More propaganda, unfortunately.
- Wow
- Bow wow in bowser world
- "What the hell is wrong with the Democrats that they are willing to resort to whatever slander they can find with the remotest shred of evidence?"
- I JUST lost your high regard??!!
- I JUST lost your high regard??!!
- Wow
- More propaganda, unfortunately.