They were hoping their big lie spam would do the trick and failed

Current Events » in reply to The only one who has been lying is the New York Times.

They were hoping their big lie spam would do the trick and failed

ebnelson — 6/22/2004 2:57:24 AM (archived)

And they call Kerry's flip-flops 'nuance' but can't tell the differences between what Bush said - that Saddam apparently did not directly work with AQ on 911- and the fact that Saddam was a terrorist supproter and finacier.
And they have completely the report directly from Putin that Saddam was planning attacks on the US.
Apparently the NYT is only feeling patriotic after the US suffers from sneak attacks.
Other than that they prove themselves to be venal fools.
Ed

The whole thread (37 posts)

More lies... - Derek - 6/21/2004 2:28:04 PM
- The only one who has been lying is the New York Times. - REB - 6/21/2004 3:15:00 PM
  - They were hoping their big lie spam would do the trick and failed - ebnelson - 6/22/2004 2:57:24 AM
    - re: They were hoping their big lie spam would do the trick and failed - REB - 6/22/2004 11:58:35 AM
  - Also in today's New York Post... - Robert - 6/21/2004 5:09:57 PM
    - re: Also in today's New York Post... - REB - 6/21/2004 5:48:55 PM
      - Opinion versus fact - Robert - 6/21/2004 6:31:55 PM
    - "There never was any connection between Iraq and al Qaeda" - RobVG - 6/21/2004 5:35:55 PM
      - "connection" vs. "link" - Robert - 6/21/2004 6:24:23 PM
        
        The old Clinton Word Game- how fun. - REB - 6/21/2004 7:24:30 PM
        
        re: "connection" vs. "link" - gbaikie - 6/21/2004 6:41:30 PM
        
        Sources? No problem. - Robert - 6/21/2004 7:06:07 PM
        
        re: Sources? No problem. - gbaikie - 6/22/2004 12:32:52 AM
        
        More - gbaikie - 6/23/2004 4:20:10 AM
        
        re: Sources? No problem. - Robert - 6/22/2004 1:45:16 AM
        
        Dogged pursuit of semantic exoneration - gbaikie - 6/22/2004 7:40:05 AM
        
        re: Dogged pursuit of semantic exoneration - REB - 6/22/2004 12:01:18 PM
        
        "long-established ties" -Cheney - RobVG - 6/21/2004 7:33:53 PM
        
        Word games - SteveS - 6/21/2004 11:19:51 PM
        
        re: Word games - REB - 6/22/2004 12:16:33 PM
      - Did you not read the excerpt? (n/t) - alcaray - 6/21/2004 6:23:57 PM
        
        Yeah, I did - RobVG - 6/21/2004 6:57:44 PM
        
        What I'm missing: - alcaray - 6/21/2004 9:07:27 PM
        
        Commissioner John Lehman - RobVG - 6/22/2004 3:44:25 AM
        
        I thought we were waiting for the report. - alcaray - 6/22/2004 3:46:07 PM
        
        We are ;) - RobVG - 6/22/2004 4:06:40 PM
        
        Nice to see Clinton no longer being accused.... - Tony - 6/22/2004 9:16:37 PM
        
        New evidence, doncha know. (n/t) - alcaray - 6/22/2004 10:55:29 PM
        
        re: Commissioner John Lehman - REB - 6/22/2004 11:51:42 AM
        
        --- - RobVG - 6/21/2004 10:03:59 PM
        
        fair enough (n/t) - alcaray - 6/21/2004 10:14:53 PM
  - re: If what the WH says is true - Raoul - 6/21/2004 4:40:06 PM
    - re: If what the WH says is true - REB - 6/21/2004 4:49:22 PM
      - You've lost this argument REB - Lindy - 6/21/2004 5:19:37 PM
        
        And the UFOs told you this? (n/t) - ebnelson - 6/22/2004 2:59:19 AM
        
        How? - REB - 6/21/2004 5:41:59 PM
        
        That is becoming more apparent daily - ebnelson - 6/22/2004 3:01:39 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (37 posts)