re:CIA's responsability?
Weren't there questions about the CIA's inability to prevent 9/11?
Wouldn't that have made the CIA more careful when faced with the need to search for WMDs?
The CIA, I heard from the current director, had nobody in Iraq to check the existence of the alleged WMDs. No facts to lean on , only beliefs.
If the CIA cried wolf about the WMDs, then, how can it be believed and trusted at the present time?
I'm sure there's much more objectivity at the CIA (which shouldn't be partisan) than at the White House, which has ideologues with an agenda.
The only logical conclusion is that the CIA is paying for Bush's commitment to war in Iraq.
At a moment when international terrorism is spreading and requires a trusted agency.
Raoul