Tom, that's the end of this crap. You once again took something I posted and turned it completely around. I did not say I condoned what any of these insurgents are doing, only that you or I don't have any clue as to where they came from or what their families think of them. And most importantly what kind of future enemies are we are creating by gunning them down. I never said once that I believed we shouldn't be fighting the war with all the resources we have. If we're there we have to fight all out and try to prevent our own casualties and those of the cooperative civilians.

However, and read this intensely cause I don't seem to be getting through to you here, in future decades our incursion into Iraq is going to end up biting us in the ass because of the violence we're having to commit to get the job done. There is no clean kill you moron. Someone is always around to get revenge afterwards. In the case of a purely defensive war where you're turning back invaders, that phenomena is greatly reduced. However, a great number of the Iraqi people don't see our incursion there as a defensive response. They see it as an occupation, an overthrow of their country.

Ah, why do I even bother. Anyone that brings any semblance of reason and logic into an argument with you is simply labeled some kind of radical or their patriotism is questioned. Pol Pot. Sheesh. Someone tries to bring a little taste of humanity into a conversation and suddenly Pol Pot's their buddy. Let's just stop talking to one another. It'll be much less frustrating. Enjoy your moronic blogs.