It was long supply lines and a harsh winter.
It wasn't the fighting in front of Stalingrad and Moscow, it was winter and long lines of supply.
And, I'm sure, it was the long Russian lines of supply and the harsh German winters that helped the Russians enter Berlin.
Think.
Would you say the losses Germany experienced in Russia in men and material, the losses of manpower being well-nigh irreplaceable, were not due to Russian efforts, but the weather got 'em, and the fact that they were poorly supplied?
The 20 million people Russia lost in that war - they were all standing around watching the Germans struggle with the cold weather and long supply lines?
Obviously not. But, frankly, I'm getting tired of trying to point out the obvious. Good luck with that worldview.
Arf
Current Events » in reply to Please Give Me Your Brilliant Count Of The Russian Troups In The Pacific
Now, according to this post it wasn't Russian resistance which beat Germany.
The whole thread (41 posts)
- Signs that the "war on terrorism" can be lost
- A failed strategy
- must say ..
- Yes, the dems strategy of insulting our allies, insulting the Nat. Guard, and revelling in our casualties is failing. (n/t)
- Once again, you insult our allies
- Well, here. 'How can you say we're going it alone - - "
- Signs that democrats are years behind the curve
- It's a war.
- Sure, if we don't fight back,
- A failed strategy