Current Events » in reply to Signs that the "war on terrorism" can be lost

The whole thread (41 posts)

• Signs that the "war on terrorism" can be lost - alcaray - 9/3/2004 6:09:17 PM
  • A failed strategy - Donald - 9/3/2004 7:50:36 PM
    • must say .. - Daniel - 9/4/2004 4:24:31 AM
      • SA Didn't Sponsor 9/11 - Mark Eby - 9/4/2004 9:14:02 PM
        • Is that so? - Daniel - 9/6/2004 8:03:36 PM
    • Yes, the dems strategy of insulting our allies, insulting the Nat. Guard, and revelling in our casualties is failing. (n/t) - ebnelson - 9/4/2004 3:37:43 AM
      • re: Was a load! Saying one person didn't do his duty is not attacking the Guard! - Chris Vancil - 9/4/2004 5:46:26 AM
        • V E R Y S L O W L Y - ebnelson - 9/4/2004 12:56:00 PM
    • Once again, you insult our allies - Larry J - 9/3/2004 8:19:03 PM
      • Well, here. 'How can you say we're going it alone - - " - Bowser - 9/3/2004 8:44:48 PM
        • Did You Ever Study History? - Mark Eby - 9/4/2004 2:24:16 AM
          • Everything but on the issue. Absolutely irrelevant, non-responsive, and silly. - Bowser - 9/4/2004 5:05:57 AM
            • Please Give Me Your Brilliant Count Of The Russian Troups In The Pacific - Mark Eby - 9/4/2004 2:35:35 PM
              • Now, according to this post it wasn't Russian resistance which beat Germany. - Bowser - 9/4/2004 5:26:43 PM
                • Do You Ever Bother And Try To Understand Counter Points - Mark Eby - 9/4/2004 6:00:59 PM
            • re: Everything but on the issue. Absolutely irrelevant, non-responsive, and silly. - gbaikie - 9/4/2004 6:10:57 AM
              • The Russians beat the Germans. - Bowser - 9/4/2004 11:57:35 AM
                • Without US logisitcs - ebnelson - 9/4/2004 7:53:25 PM
                • re: The Russians beat the Germans. - gbaikie - 9/4/2004 4:25:21 PM
              • re: Everything but on the issue. Absolutely irrelevant, non-responsive, and silly. - Chris Vancil - 9/4/2004 8:40:09 AM
  • Signs that democrats are years behind the curve - ebnelson - 9/3/2004 7:34:32 PM
  • It's a war. - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 6:36:10 PM
    • Funny thing is........ - Tony - 9/3/2004 8:56:03 PM
    • The terror war is a concept war. Just like the war on drugs. It simply is a means to keep the war machine going. (n/t) - John - 9/3/2004 7:08:19 PM
      • You are forgetting that we did not start this war. NT - REB - 9/3/2004 7:11:37 PM
        • re:Who did and when? (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/4/2004 1:31:30 AM
        • That's not quite true. - Bowser - 9/4/2004 12:59:50 AM
          • Chris: "What happened?" Bowser: "We asked for it." Cripes. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/4/2004 2:00:12 AM
            • re: That is not what I asked. Asking questions does not me you don't know the answers... - Chris Vancil - 9/4/2004 5:30:45 AM
              • You might have been better off with "what happened?" (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/4/2004 7:08:57 AM
    • Probably should be on flame - alcaray - 9/3/2004 6:51:06 PM
      • Okay, think about this... - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 7:43:04 PM
        • point out that statistics show Bush is doing a bad job at terrorism... - alcaray - 9/3/2004 9:41:59 PM
          • Statistics show that the middle of a war is more violent than no war? Why is this news? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 11:48:38 PM
        • True enough, but....... - Tony - 9/3/2004 7:55:54 PM
          • The "more troops" myth. - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 8:48:08 PM
            • Myth? So you say. - Tony - 9/3/2004 9:10:23 PM
  • Sure, if we don't fight back, - REB - 9/3/2004 6:22:55 PM
    • Or Let France Lead It (n/t) - Mark Eby - 9/3/2004 10:48:30 PM
      • France couldn't do any worse (n/t) - alcaray - 9/4/2004 5:29:38 AM
        • You Must Not Have Had Any English History - Mark Eby - 9/4/2004 9:21:16 PM