Larry did a good job filling out the picture of the origins of the Chinese program, and added the useful information that parts of the US program didn't originate with the Germans. I think the result is a similar nuanced picture: Neither program sprang into being from nothing, and both have roots in another nation's efforts. I should also point out that the Soviet program benefited greatly from their Germans, too.
It's also fair to point out that all three nations had individual pioneers--our Goddard, the Russian Tsiolkovsky, and whatever forgotten Chinese genius invented gunpowder.
I don't think any of that detracts from my main point: Space programs require a collective effort sustained over many years. America managed it for just one glorious decade, the Soviets for a little more than two. China's just beginning its serious push into space, and I expect that once they get rolling, they're not going to lose interest any time soon. Another one of those tortoise-and-hare stories--the late starter may, in the long run, put us hares to shame.
Off Topic » in reply to re: Home-grown space technology
re: Home-grown space technology
The whole thread (38 posts)
- Divides between the United States and Europe
- Then there's foreign policy.
- Long live the difference
- Status report on the European Dream
- The European Dream - a nice dream if you can live it
- re: Divides between the United States and Europe
- re: Divides between the United States and Europe
- Nice euphemism.
- re: Divides between the United States and Europe
