I thought Bush I and Dole ran lousy campaigns and they lost.
I think (and I said months ago) that the hate Bush approach bites the Dems.
Bush was a vulnerable candidate and it seems that Kerry has blown it. Who do you blame, the electorate or the candidate? I was ripe for the picking if the Dems had chosen a better guy or even if Kerry had a more cogent message. Instead he comes off as an elitist boob.
Yes, the GOP is swarming but consider this, aside from the candidate.
Terry McAuliffe
Moveon.org
Michael Moore
Assorted Hollywood spokespersons
At least a half dozen other orgs and individuals I can't recall
Would the dems be better or worse off without the above?
While I can appreciate that you see less incompetence that I see, surely you can see that major problems exist in the dem party.
The playing field is level and I think the voters usually wind up picking the best man.
Flame » in reply to When there is little difference.......
Do candidates get what they deserve?
The whole thread (66 posts)
- When there is little difference.......
- Humans are pack animals
- The drool from a wide variety of sources.
- I understand the anger and frustration.
- and it matters not what a thread is about
- Do candidates get what they deserve?
- No kidding. It's like being in a roomful of second graders.
- re: Admit it Tony: You want to join the dark side.
- I used to think
- Hi Dav.
- LOL (n/t)
- Same old . . .
- Insulting is...
- Hi Dav.
- Been thinking the same for a few days.
