And before you say something even more obtuse, I'm in no way calling you or anyone else a Nazi. I'm opposed to eugenics and I showed an example of when it was government policy to kill or sterilize the weak or the infirm.
According to eyewitness testimony from some of the nursing staff that have cared for her, she isn't nearly as brain dead as the news reports are leading us to believe. Who am I to believe, you or the people who've actually cared for this poor woman? Why are so many seemingly so insistant for her to die when there is no reason why she must? Why are so many people who'll go to extreme legal measures to protect a condemned murderer from execution silent when it comes to an innocent person like this?
Flame » in reply to I would think you'd ask Robert to remove the above. I'd hope so.
No, I stand by what I wrote
The whole thread (43 posts)
- Where's the line? With enough machinery, any corpse can be kept alive.
- re: Where's the line?
- She wasn't hooked up to any machinery, just a feeding tube
- Please don't attempt humor on this matter, even on Flame.
- By that definition, my grandkids are being kept alive artificially
- I would think you'd ask Robert to remove the above. I'd hope so.
- No, I stand by what I wrote
- Regarding her neurological condition. Or, if there were a chance I'd agree with you.
- Sounds like the neurologists disagree. (n/t)
- Regarding her neurological condition. Or, if there were a chance I'd agree with you.
- No, I stand by what I wrote
- and here the agenda behind the noise comes out
- I would think you'd ask Robert to remove the above. I'd hope so.
- You are the one who is turning this matter into a circus
- By that definition, my grandkids are being kept alive artificially
- So she wasn't hooked up to any machinery except the machinery she was hooked up to.
- Please don't attempt humor on this matter, even on Flame.
- re: Where's the line? With enough machinery, any corpse can be kept alive.
