Okay
Okay, I can see that nothing I post is going to pry the "peer-reviewed" mantra away from you.
I have seen "Not Invented Here" and other things that stifle new ideas, or ideas inconsistent with the accepted views, in the space design field for years. Why do you think climate science is immune?
The Armagh information can be found by browsing this site. But I assume you already checked it out instead of relying on the BBC.
They readily admit they don't have all the answers. Neither does anyone else.
