Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to proof

I also liked that link as a source.
et — (archived)

The point of "Chris Landsea Leaves IPCC" was that the IPCC was trying to suggest that gloal warming would lead to stronger Atlantic hurricane activity. He felt his research didn't support this and rightly made a stink about it.

That link makes no case for any dispute about global warming. It's about keeping the IPCC scientifically honest by making the issue public.

"My view is that when people identify themselves as being associated with the IPCC and then make pronouncements far outside current scientific understandings that this will harm the credibility of climate change science and will in the longer term diminish our role in public policy."

It's about climate change science. Would you be as excited about a similar instance where global warming predictions were being down-played?

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (40 posts)