I get the feeling you're quoting lines from sources and using all this laser equipment without really understanding the science behind it.
This from the village idiot that thinks that quoting from the dictionary is a scientific argument...
Yup, so far I have been twiddling dozens of knobs and so far I have been just amazingly lucky... LOL
There was a great scene in the film "She's Having a Baby" from 1988 where Kevin Bacon applies for a job at a top AD agency and they take him into the room and say, "We went over all your application and references and the only thing that's true on this piece of paper appears to be your name. But that took a lot of balls and creative writing skills...you're hired. You'll learn as you go."
:) oh you get your idea of reality from bad movies... that explains a lot...
When interviewing for my first job I was actually asked to solve a problem they were having that day... I did...
To help visualize it, imagine squeezing all the electrons floating loose in the outer Van Allen field. Shrink the width of the field and squeeze all the electrons into a very thin, almost solid wall ,of electron energy. That would increase the gamma ray scattering by Compton effect and effectively shield the earth.
Homework problem for you- look up compton scattering and TRY to understand it, then explain how taking all the electrons in the van allen belt and squeezing then into a 'wall' would help... hint: look up cross sections for compton scattering and then look up the density of electrons in the van allen belt... also look at the angular distribution of scatter- then do the calculations- I am happy to grade you if you do the work... (but you cant do that can you?)
Your employers must be either incompetents, idiots or very kind-hearted souls. I know I sure as heck would never hire you.
ROTFLMAO!!!! Yup... last time my employers made a major observation was... well... yesterday- how are you doing, how bout your employers??
The fact that you would say something so stupid and expect that people here would believe you says volumes about your delusions... You are a joke here, SDAI... its all the funnier that you are the only one that doesnt know it...
PS Sorry to be so harsh, but I've put up with more than enough abuse from you on these boards, when you clearly don't know jacksquat.
Yet you have yet to prove any of your claims.... Or did I miss one of your papers? Mine are easy to find.... surely someone as gifted as yourself has MANY more published papers, right?
Flame » in reply to For RL from community
re: For RL from community
The whole thread (67 posts)
- For RL from community
- re: For RL from community
- Hey Vortex Boy
- "Gainful Employment"
- Hey Lindy: I thought the omnipotent line was funny. (n/t)
- Thanks..... (n/t)
- re: "Gainful Employment"
- re: "Gainful Employment"
- :-) I am 'beaming' (n/t)
- Do you think it needs further amplification, or is the stimulated emission of responses sufficient to shed light on the subject? (n/t)
- Oooh, even better....
- Don't think Lindy's quite on the same wavelength (n/t)
- If you'd been here for more than 5 min, you might know that I KNOW this Sammy.... (n/t)
- re: If you'd been paying attention, you might realize Sam was merely adding to the frequency of puns..... (n/t)
- I just can't resist dumb puns. Sorry. (n/t)
- My bad. Attribute it to stimulated emission. (n/t)
- Let's hope not nocturnal ones like RL's (n/t)
- Hey, at least I have demonstrated I can go all night! :)
- Let's hope not nocturnal ones like RL's (n/t)
- My bad. Attribute it to stimulated emission. (n/t)
- If you'd been here for more than 5 min, you might know that I KNOW this Sammy.... (n/t)
- Don't think Lindy's quite on the same wavelength (n/t)
- :-) I am 'beaming' (n/t)
- Hey Lindy: I thought the omnipotent line was funny. (n/t)
