Do you think it needs further amplification, or is the stimulated emission of responses sufficient to shed light on the subject?
Flame » in reply to :-) I am 'beaming'
The whole thread (67 posts)
- For RL from community
- re: For RL from community
- Hey Vortex Boy
- "Gainful Employment"
- Hey Lindy: I thought the omnipotent line was funny. (n/t)
- Thanks..... (n/t)
- re: "Gainful Employment"
- re: "Gainful Employment"
- :-) I am 'beaming' (n/t)
- Do you think it needs further amplification, or is the stimulated emission of responses sufficient to shed light on the subject? (n/t)
- Oooh, even better....
- Don't think Lindy's quite on the same wavelength (n/t)
- If you'd been here for more than 5 min, you might know that I KNOW this Sammy.... (n/t)
- re: If you'd been paying attention, you might realize Sam was merely adding to the frequency of puns..... (n/t)
- I just can't resist dumb puns. Sorry. (n/t)
- My bad. Attribute it to stimulated emission. (n/t)
- Let's hope not nocturnal ones like RL's (n/t)
- Hey, at least I have demonstrated I can go all night! :)
- Let's hope not nocturnal ones like RL's (n/t)
- My bad. Attribute it to stimulated emission. (n/t)
- If you'd been here for more than 5 min, you might know that I KNOW this Sammy.... (n/t)
- Don't think Lindy's quite on the same wavelength (n/t)
- :-) I am 'beaming' (n/t)
- Hey Lindy: I thought the omnipotent line was funny. (n/t)