Beware of photos blown up to the pixel level. And when you go past the pixel level you are adding data that is not there.
If you study this kind of thing, you’ll find 99% of their evidence is at the blurry pixel level. Once we get clear pictures of the same area (More pixels- more data) the anomalies go away. This usually doesn’t stops the likes of Hoagland. He goes down to the new pixel level to find more anomies.
Yes, 99% of these anomalies are at the pixel level. The few that are at a clear normal viewing level have been open for interpretation. For Example, some of Hoagland’s Mars rocks pictures are farley clear (Not all of them are), but they look like rocks to most of us, but to him they look like alien artifacts.
Be careful with this kind of stuff, and stay away from the pixel level anomalies. Hoagland has made a lot of money by making this his livelihood, and there are many who would like to follow in his footsteps.
I really wish there were alien ruins on Mars. I wish there were active alien cities on Mars. But there has yet to be any evidence as such.
Off Topic » in reply to Any credibility here? : http://www.iwonderproductions.com/mars.htm
Looks like another Hoagland want-a-be.
The whole thread (31 posts)
- Any credibility here? : http://www.iwonderproductions.com/mars.htm (n/t)
- Looks like another Hoagland want-a-be.
- Blow up any photo made of pixels far enough, and you get geometry. (n/t)
- Care to make any other comments?
- **Moved from space**
- Aha.
- Thank you, gentlemen, for your concise and thorough replies to the expanded question. (n/t)
- lets start over
- Aha.