And how would we work more "closely" with the U.N.?
Would like to see the details on that.
The U.N.'s track record on peacekeeping is not that great. But then, nobody at the U.N. stands to lose their job if an area they're keeping "peace" in is the site of massacres, or if somebody they don't think should have nuclear weapons develops them right under their nose.
The idea that Iraq would have been just swell with another ten years of inspections doesn't stand up to much examination either, but then nobody here wants to go there.
Question of the day: What do you think Saddam would be doing today as Iran was developing nuclear weapons next door?