Flame » in reply to Not hard to understand. Only confusing because you refused to articulate it till now.

The whole thread (51 posts)

• Reply to "John McCain" - Fox - 8/12/2006 5:09:08 AM
  • What hath Fox wrought? (n/t) - ER - 8/12/2006 5:08:48 PM
  • Loserman and McCraven, and the Democratic Quest for Spines - The Veep - 8/12/2006 5:02:08 PM
    • Aw, you can read cue cards. - Mary Anne - 8/12/2006 10:32:51 PM
      • re: Your nomination - Fox - 8/13/2006 12:51:48 AM
      • re: Aw, you can read cue cards. - azstrummer - 8/13/2006 12:25:33 AM
        • How about Gothic Lolita with a riding crop? - Mary Anne - 8/13/2006 1:38:18 AM
          • kickeeey!!!!!! - Publius - 8/13/2006 5:52:20 PM
            • More like this: - Mary Anne - 8/13/2006 6:25:41 PM
              • Actually, I think she's kinda cute. (n/t) - ER - 8/15/2006 1:33:22 AM
                • Ugly shoes, though. (n/t) - alcaray - 8/15/2006 5:22:14 PM
                • Yes - in a Salem Harlot way ;-) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 8/15/2006 4:08:21 AM
              • Now *that's* what I call "Death warmed over" - Fox - 8/14/2006 4:22:54 PM
              • Crap, can't bend my fingers to type. - azstrummer - 8/14/2006 4:11:33 AM
              • Yeah, but it's no fun to take off an imagination! (n/t) - Publius - 8/14/2006 1:50:00 AM
      • We'll write you in.! - ER - 8/12/2006 11:46:10 PM
    • I agree with you on McCain - Lindy - 8/12/2006 7:11:00 PM
      • re: I agree with you on McCain - ER - 8/12/2006 8:16:33 PM
        • We have spoken of this before....... - Lindy - 8/12/2006 8:40:00 PM
          • No, he's just a politician that smells blood in the water. - ER - 8/12/2006 8:52:45 PM
            • Keep your eyes out for those GOP bast*rds! - Lindy - 8/12/2006 10:05:05 PM
  • the view from over here - Daniel - 8/12/2006 4:34:47 PM
    • Not bad.... - FrankC - 8/12/2006 7:40:10 PM
      • You'd just get the same initiatives over and over again, with slight variations - tony - 8/12/2006 8:57:40 PM
      • re: Not bad.... - Daniel - 8/12/2006 8:15:59 PM
    • *chuckle* (n/t) - Fox - 8/12/2006 4:59:39 PM
  • LOL - Lindy - 8/12/2006 4:22:54 PM
    • It comes and goes... - Fox - 8/12/2006 5:13:14 PM
  • Well done. And here's the short form of the betrayal. - Bowser - 8/12/2006 2:33:49 PM
  • This is one I can't resist. - ER - 8/12/2006 12:43:47 PM
    • re: Pendulums, and clear choice - Fox - 8/12/2006 6:27:06 PM
    • Down the middle - Lindy - 8/12/2006 4:36:21 PM
    • Neither can I - McFly - 8/12/2006 2:15:44 PM
  • Sinking ship - Tom Brosz - 8/12/2006 6:47:20 AM
    • The Democratic voters of Connecticut have chosen the candidate they want to represent them. - Mary Anne - 8/12/2006 10:11:51 PM
      • Current polls of ALL voters: Lieberman 46%, Lamont 41% (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 8/13/2006 6:49:24 AM
        • Where's the Republican candidate? - Mary Anne - 8/13/2006 6:05:51 PM
          • Six percent. Down from 13. - Tom Brosz - 8/14/2006 6:16:20 PM
            • You're calling an erstwhile Democratic Senator "the pro-Bush candidate". - Mary Anne - 8/15/2006 12:45:26 PM
              • "pro-Bush candidate" was supposed to be in quotes. - Tom Brosz - 8/15/2006 4:45:23 PM
                • If Lieberman's record is so liberal... - alcaray - 8/15/2006 5:24:14 PM
                  • re: If Lieberman's record is so liberal... - Tom Brosz - 8/16/2006 7:04:26 AM
                    • re: "The Republican is at six percent last time I looked." That's part of what I referred to. Again: why? - alcaray - 8/16/2006 3:14:56 PM
                      • Same reason I don't vote Libertarian. - Tom Brosz - 8/16/2006 10:54:26 PM
                        • Not hard to understand. Only confusing because you refused to articulate it till now. - alcaray - 8/17/2006 3:18:10 PM
                          • Just to wind up the thread, latest poll results in Connecticut - Tom Brosz - 8/17/2006 5:07:08 PM
                            • 75% of Republicans approved of Lieberman's job as senator. - alcaray - 8/17/2006 5:38:49 PM
          • Funny about that... - Fox - 8/14/2006 4:30:45 PM
            • He had been following the analysis of CT election law. - Mary Anne - 8/14/2006 9:01:52 PM
    • "Oh no, we wont give in, we'll keep living in the past." -- Jethro Tull (n/t) - Fox - 8/12/2006 3:40:49 PM
    • I wouldn't dwell on the sinking ship analogy if I were in your political shoes (n/t) - alcaray - 8/12/2006 3:39:13 PM