"But if the the current US administration is blaming the UN, I consider this a good sign because this means the US is interested and might positively contribute to its modernization."
Yes, current Administration is interested in doing this and a lot of other countries are also interested in this [the problems are very obvious]. But that doesn't mean that the UN can be improved- the various reforms may work, but the UN's main problems are problems common to any bureaucracy.
For instance, look at what Goldin did in regards to the NASA bureaucracy. I would say that Goldin's main effort was to reform NASA's bureaucracy and on that score, failed pretty miserably- it could be said he made it worse. Now, no doubt there was some improvement but I would also say there was some damage done. In other words it was a mixed bag and hard to see a marked improvement [due to Goldin efforts- though it's possible in the same time period it could got even worse without Goldin's effort].
As far as I know, fixing bureaucracies is *black box* type "technology". And you would utterly change this world, if there was some known effective way to improve bureaucracies.
Current Events » in reply to re: What if there were no UN t?
re: What if there were no UN t?
The whole thread (44 posts)
- Possible North Korea nuclear test?
- 550 tons TNT-equivalent?
- What wonderful news! Another UN success story. On Deck: IRAN. (n/t)
- NORTH KOREA Earthquake Data
- North Korea has sold missile technology to Iran, Pakistan & Egypt
- Get ready for a roller coaster ride, folks.
- re: Possible North Korea nuclear test?
- BULLETIN: G. W. Bush has been President since 1-20-01. NOT W. J. Clinton.
- A "senior Bush administration official"? Who?
- the nuclear excrument just hit the political fan (n/t)
