Get ready for a roller coaster ride, folks.

Current Events » in reply to Possible North Korea nuclear test?

Get ready for a roller coaster ride, folks.

SDAI-Tech1 — 10/9/2006 5:26:59 AM (archived)

Cause from here on out things go downhill fast.

2.5 kiloton detonation. Probably attempted for 4.0 kilotons and their reaction didn't continue. Their enriched uranium may not be up to par.

Nows the time our intelligence is put to the test for the proper way to contain NK's nukes, save the NK people from their leadership and get off the ride in one piece.

Bush has a few more restless nights ahead and the icon clock on the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists now reads 5 seconds to Midnight.

Time for folks to forget Foley and get focused on the big picture.

The whole thread (44 posts)

Possible North Korea nuclear test? - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 3:03:07 AM
- 550 tons TNT-equivalent? - Robert - 10/9/2006 4:57:03 PM
  - re: 550 tons TNT-equivalent? - ER - 10/9/2006 7:57:41 PM
    - Possible - Robert - 10/9/2006 9:07:15 PM
      - A short (millisecond) sudden spike... - We will regret these days- - 10/10/2006 5:16:05 AM
      - Trying to help on a serious subject - still a sad day.... - 10/10/2006 3:10:10 AM
        
        I am not fit to hold thy sandels! - Adam Bomber - 10/10/2006 3:00:53 PM
        
        Best post on the matter so far (n/t) - Kim Jong Yeti - 10/10/2006 4:58:51 AM
      - Micronuke: Davy Crockett - Alan G. Archer - 10/9/2006 9:19:42 PM
        
        That is cool (n/t) - Adam Bomber - 10/10/2006 1:49:05 PM
        
        there used to be something called a blivet(?) - alcaray - 10/10/2006 1:04:11 AM
        
        Falcon and Genie - Alan G. Archer - 10/10/2006 9:54:33 AM
  - Maybe they're not developing a city-buster, but a backpack device. (n/t) - ER - 10/9/2006 7:53:12 PM
    - Possible..That would leave a longer radioactive legacy. - Jacob Samorodin - 10/10/2006 12:49:32 AM
- What wonderful news! Another UN success story. On Deck: IRAN. (n/t) - Adam Bomber - 10/9/2006 2:26:16 PM
  - US emasculates UN, then expects it to be effective. (n/t) - Bowser - 10/9/2006 5:39:33 PM
    - Really? Tell us exactly how that was done. - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 6:47:53 PM
      - re: What if there were no UN t? - Raoul - 10/9/2006 8:29:41 PM
        
        Then there might be a revived "League of Nations" in its place. (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 10/10/2006 12:52:10 AM
        
        re: What if there were no UN t? - gbaikie - 10/9/2006 9:20:46 PM
      - Fantasy Board stuff. You HAVE to be kidding. Especially you. - Bowser - 10/9/2006 7:43:24 PM
        
        Usual non-answer. - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 7:48:07 PM
        
        Just plain lost it, TB. Talk about revising history. - Bowser - 10/9/2006 8:22:51 PM
    - Thanks Bowz....... - Lindy - 10/9/2006 5:41:32 PM
- NORTH KOREA Earthquake Data - Lindy - 10/9/2006 1:44:02 PM
- North Korea has sold missile technology to Iran, Pakistan & Egypt - SDF - 10/9/2006 8:37:13 AM
  - Kim Jong-Il isn't a leader - SDF - 10/9/2006 8:40:04 AM
- Get ready for a roller coaster ride, folks. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/9/2006 5:26:59 AM
  - One reason we need the UN.. - Lindy - 10/9/2006 3:19:40 PM
- re: Possible North Korea nuclear test? - ....sad day - 10/9/2006 4:49:41 AM
  - re: Possible North Korea nuclear test? - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 5:10:33 AM
    - "550-tons TNT-equivalent?" - Robert - 10/9/2006 4:58:46 PM
      - Difficult question to answer. - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 5:03:06 PM
        
        The limits of headology - Robert - 10/9/2006 5:30:33 PM
        
        I agree that this isn't a panic situation. - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 7:42:45 PM
        
        re: Difficult question to answer. - azstrummer - 10/9/2006 5:29:03 PM
        
        Wrong. Israel was invaded (unsuccessfully) after she got nukes. (n/t) - ER - 10/9/2006 7:56:02 PM
        
        Probably should've included that word. - azstrummer - 10/9/2006 10:13:22 PM
        
        I don't know the answers to those questions. - ER - 10/10/2006 1:01:32 AM
        
        Help me out on that one. (n/t) - Bowser - 10/9/2006 9:46:01 PM
- BULLETIN: G. W. Bush has been President since 1-20-01. NOT W. J. Clinton. - Bowser - 10/9/2006 4:12:28 AM
- A "senior Bush administration official"? Who? - Bowser - 10/9/2006 4:06:19 AM
  - That was all the radio said at the time I posted. - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 5:09:28 AM
- the nuclear excrument just hit the political fan (n/t) - Chief Yetiologist - 10/9/2006 3:43:38 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (44 posts)