But I'd say 70-80% of them would be unicellular species. On Earth most of the oxygen we breath comes from the oceans, algae to be specific. So here's a rough break down of what I'd carry.
30 species of bacteria
10 species of algae
10 species of plankton (diatoms, etc)
5 species of kelp
5 species of lichen
10 species of base food species (krell, etc)
10 species of filter feeders (sponges, corals, etc)
10 species of land plants
10 land animal species
The bacteria and lichens would go in first, followed by the algae. Plankton and filter feeders next. After that, the multicellular life would be placed. IMO the oceans and lakes need to be stocked first before land organisms.
It's just a rough draft, but a basic no frills ecosystem wouldn't require many species to begin working. Remember, in the beginning Earth only had one species.
Space/Science » in reply to You wouldn't by any chance have a list of those 100 essential species, would you?
It would take a while to make a specific list.
The whole thread (73 posts)
- Cultivating life on Earth and elsewhere.
- SEND COMPOST n/t
- Don't make it too complicated.
- Most colonization has been done so that people can prosper
- re: The time factor
- I believe you're absolutely correct.
- re: Cultivating life on Earth and elsewhere.
- Terraforming socialistic?
- Tired of people implying technology is bad or humans are bad for using it
- Who needs von Neumann machines?
