As someone pointed out, we've been using natural self-replicating machines for as long as there has been agriculture and domestication.
If the inherent evolutionary capacity of a Von Neumann machine is limited to approximately the same level as natural organisms, that will help a lot.
Nobody worries about coming out to the cow pasture in the morning and finding they've all evolved into something carnivorous.
Keep the machines simple. Replication, not evolution. For example, building a machine that has the capacity to conceive and build brand-new designs may not be all that smart. You have now changed a biological evolutionary timescale into a cultural evolutionary timescale, and if you watch human history, you know how much fun THAT can generate.
Space/Science » in reply to Multi-cellular automata?
Evolution
The whole thread (73 posts)
- Cultivating life on Earth and elsewhere.
- SEND COMPOST n/t
- Don't make it too complicated.
- Most colonization has been done so that people can prosper
- re: The time factor
- I believe you're absolutely correct.
- re: Cultivating life on Earth and elsewhere.
- Terraforming socialistic?
- Tired of people implying technology is bad or humans are bad for using it
- Who needs von Neumann machines?
