I think that a lot of people will wake up to a harsh reality if they believe a fusion reactor is a possibility.

Nonetheless, we know that fusion works because every star is a fusion reactor. The fusion reactors of the stars and the sun are held together by a direct force field. This works very well and efficiently -- this force field is gravity.

See right here is where they fall off the beam. Every star is hypothesized to be a fusion reactor. And it all dates to the late Hans Bethe's work he initially formulated while on a train commute back in the early forties for which he later won a Nobel Prize.

However, in my opinion, the world was quick to accept his theory, mainly because there is a preponderance of ITBWG thinking.

ITBWG= It's the best we've got.

No one has proven that the sun fuses atoms, but instead we measure the types of radiation that emit from the sun to see if they match the theorized radiation release from Bethe's fusion reaction. The neutrino discrepancy was a huge one, but again Bethe's theory still fit the ITBWG paradigm, and so it was passed over until theorists put forth a tack-on theory about the neutrinos morphing as they cross space to Earth. And fewer still were coming out with other solar theories after Bethe's work was the de facto explanation included in textbooks. But still it is a HUGE assumption that the sun is actually fusing atoms to release radiation.

I won't get into it into too much detail here, but needless to say, I don't think stars are fusing atoms, but are actually creating them and in an environment where they are not only formed but where hydrogen atoms evolve into helium atoms - and the radiation is a byproduct of these galaxial atom factories at work. The giveaway is the galaxy arms and stars formation following the magnetic lines of force. This illustrates that star formation is not a gravitational condensation process, as generally assumed, but is instead a manifestation of the galaxy itself and its magnetic force lines.

Stars form along the magnetic lines of force where great forces are at work channeling the galaxy's gargantuan energy movement and this energy finds an expression or outlet in star formation - forming hydrogen atoms by creating and polarizing energy wave forms magnetically - a proton (positively biased wave grouping), electron (negatively biased wave grouping) and the nucleus which is really just a coherent field of energy which sustains this new polarized atom. The hydrogen atom is further polarized after enough time in this enormous magnetic field and as more energy is channeled into it, it evolves into a helium atom, two protons and two electrons. It's not fusion - it's helio-magnetic evolution. And this is why we find hydrogen and helium comprising a large part of our universe - stars create hydrogen and various isotopes of hydrogen until it turns into helium after enough time in the magnetic stew. This is why stars are so stable and why I suspect the time table for a stars' life is completely off the mark - since it is fueled by the galaxy itself.

And this is why, I believe, all attempts at recreating fusion reactors here on Earth have failed, even after billions of dollars have been spent on research - the hypothesized fusion chains are just that.

It's a false Holy Grail for those seeking unlimited energy. I think it will be easier to manipulate and use magnetic fields to channel energy - just as the sun does.