See right here is where they fall off the beam. Every star is hypothesized to be a fusion reactor. And it all dates to the late Hans Bethe's work he initially formulated while on a train commute back in the early forties for which he later won a Nobel Prize.

Yeah, it was just something he did on a lark... Do you have any idea how much work and science went into that? How much it has been subject to peer review, calculation and observation- Do you have ANY education on solar physics. In short is there any reason to take your word over that of a Nobel prize winning respected physicist, whose work has been scrutenized for many decades??

We understand the process of fusion quite well, we understand that it MUST be happening given the conditions in our sun... That Stellar fusion is the proces by which our sun provides energy is not under debate by any credible, sane scientist.

No one has proven that the sun fuses atoms, but instead we measure the types of radiation that emit from the sun to see if they match the theorized radiation release from Bethe's fusion reaction. The neutrino discrepancy was a huge one,

No, it isnt- the solar neutrino 'Problem' was due to an assumption in the standard model of particle physics that neutrinos were massless- this was KNOWN to be an assumption, and the standard model in no way required them to be massless- as far back as 1969 theorists predicted that if the neutrino had mass then they could 'oscillate' between the electron, muon, and tau type of neutrino. IF they did this, then the detectors were bound to detect fewer than predicted since they primarily could only look for one type.

See here: nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/articles/bahcall/

Combining the SNO and the Super-Kamiokande measurements, the SNO collaboration determined the total number of solar neutrinos of all types (electron, muon, and tau) as well as the number of just electron neutrinos. The total number of neutrinos of all types agrees with the number predicted by the computer model of the Sun. Electron neutrinos constitute about a third of the total number of neutrinos.

The smoking gun was discovered. The smoking gun is the difference between the total number of neutrinos and the number of only electron neutrinos. The missing neutrinos were actually present, but in the form of the more difficult to detect muon and tau neutrinos.

The epochal results announced in June 2001 were confirmed by subsequent experiments. The SNO collaboration made unique new measurements in which the total number of high energy neutrinos of all types was observed in the heavy water detector. These results from the SNO measurements alone show that most of the neutrinos produced in the interior of the Sun, all of which are electron neutrinos when they are produced, are changed into muon and tau neutrinos by the time they reach the Earth.

The measurement of the total number of neutrinos in the SNO detector provided the fingerprints on the smoking gun.

These revolutionary results were verified independently in an extraordinary tour-de-force by a Japanese-American experimental collaboration, Kamland, which studied, instead of solar neutrinos, anti-neutrinos emitted by nuclear power reactors in Japan and in neighboring countries. The collaboration (led by Atsuto Suzuki of Sendai, Japan) observed a deficit in the detected number of anti-neutrinos from the nuclear power reactors. A deficit had been predicted for the Kamland experiment based upon the solar model calculations, the solar neutrino measurements, and a theoretical model of neutrino behavior that explained why the previous calculations and measurements seemed to be in disagreement. The Kamland measurements significantly improved our knowledge of the parameters that characterize neutrinos.

The solar neutrino problem is no longer a 'problem'....

but again Bethe's theory still fit the ITBWG paradigm, and so it was passed over until theorists put forth a tack-on theory about the neutrinos morphing as they cross space to Earth. And fewer still were coming out with other solar theories after Bethe's work was the de facto explanation included in textbooks. But still it is a HUGE assumption that the sun is actually fusing atoms to release radiation.


The above simply is not true- it was not 'passed over', and the basic concept of oscillation dates back to 1969, The first indication that there was even a possible 'problem' was in the Homestake mine experiment in 1968... again, you have NO idea about what you are talking about...

I won't get into it into too much detail here,

That is probably wise since all your details have been wrong so far...

I don't think stars are fusing atoms, but are actually creating them

And how, pray tell are they doing this? Some mmagic that violates conservation of energy, and many other conservation laws, or is it just some 'revalation' your belly button told you?

and in an environment where they are not only formed but where hydrogen atoms evolve into helium atoms

How does hydrogen 'evolve' into helium?- protons and neutrons just magically 'appear'?

The giveaway is the galaxy arms and stars formation following the magnetic lines of force.

Do you have anything to support this claim? any empirical data? or any reason to believe it to be true at all? Or is it just another one of your asinine claims that you make as if it is accepted fact...?

This illustrates that star formation is not a gravitational condensation process, as generally assumed, but is instead a manifestation of the galaxy itself and its magnetic force lines.

Any papers to support this? any data at all? Lets take your supposition that star formation 'is instead a manifestation of the galaxy itself and its magnetic force lines. ' - WHAT process would lead that to be the case...?

Stars form along the magnetic lines of force where great forces are at work channeling the galaxy's gargantuan energy movement and this energy finds an expression or outlet in star formation -

AGAIN...HOW?

Your post just degenerates from there... I will maybe waste time debunking the drivel more later- I think its clear to all here that you dont have a clue about this at all....