Marxist philosophy drives you up the wall, Pseudoscience drives me up the wall... the thing is, political disagreements eventually boil down to personal values and beliefs- science arguments boil down to hard facts.
SDAI makes claims that are stunningly stupid, and easy to disprove, but he makes the statements as if he is stating accepted fact. This is offensive to me. I make no claim to be the 'decider' of what science is right or not- quite frankly I am not qualified in many areas- notice how I stay out of debates on string theory? In some areas I am qualified to pass judgement- and quite frankly, SDAI is a poser trying to make his delusions sound real by throwing in 'sciency' words. He is a liar, maybe intentionally so, maybe not- but a liar nontheless.
Think back- have I EVER told a lie about science? Have I ever been caught in a lie about reality? There have been a few times I posted something scientifically incorrect, but I was the one to point that out first.
In this day and age science, and rational thought, are the most important things we have- people like SDAI just pervert the science, for profit, or maybe for ego- but its perversion nontheless...
I made claims in this thread based on science, please notice I also posted that my claims should be taken with a grain of salt. SDAI made wild claims that were simple to disprove, yet nowhere did he post such a disclaimer. He is a loon, a charlatan, and he must be held accountable for his lies.
Space/Science » in reply to You know, R.L....
Tom...
The whole thread (59 posts)
- What Robert Bussard is doing lately...
- Hey JimO
- I watched the video of his presentation at google
- It's a cubo-octrahedral arrangement.
- I don't have the knowledge to evaluate his work
- The physics is sound.
- re: The physics
- There seem to be serious issues in scalability
- So Tom, do you really think this is for real?
- "No man is an island...
- re: The physics is sound.
- The physics is sound.