Sure is, sure was.
I wanted to flame the shit out of you and your post but seeing as it's still sitting here, I'll play nice and ask you WHY you think we have a right to spead "democracy" or "freedom" by destabilizing a government?
ANY government? Who gives us the right for a "regime change"?
Who changed the rules for non-agression on self-sustaining countries.
It is FOR THIS VERY REASON that we are hated around the world.
Why should we be supplying mercenaries to do it?
Let's look at the success of our supplying the Taliban or Al Qeuda for instance? All we'll do is have a cushy supply line for weapons and enough information to give them so that when they have us by the balls, they'll bite back. Take your silly stories and go wrap them up in your red, white and blue fantasies.
Current Events » in reply to The Dawn was Bleak...
re: The Dawn was Bleak...
The whole thread (64 posts)
- Bush Authorizes New Covert Action Against Iran
- Amazing how reality has been re-wrapped for some people.
- The Dawn was Bleak...
- France to back U.S. complaint against IAEA chief
- Well........
- I could ask you the same question I asked Bowser...
- Now of course if Iran sneaks people into the US.
- Communism under Reagan
- re: Communism under Reagan. Communism wasn't just under Reagan... Kennedy.
- Well, that explains it.
- re: Well, that explains it.
- No danger
- LOL
- re: Well, that explains it.
- US fantasies
- Russia was never a threat to Canada
- Because the US was there.
- Canada protected her borders just fine
- Because the US was there.
- re: Well, that explains it.
- I could ask you the same question I asked Bowser...
- At a time when America wants peace, Bush escalates. (n/t)
