Oh, but even if NASA is a jobs program why would people like Bowser be against it?
Of course, he answered that at the Space board. Still, he had no bearings on the space program or any in general because he does not believe in one.
[Now, at the moment space exploration is obviously seen unimportant- if it was important more money would spend on doing it. I think if the Dems showed more support for NASA and provided modest or significant increases in NASA funding [with the purpose being to speed up the current timetable for exploration of Moon and Mars] I would applaud this dem effort, but I don't see this as very likely- I don't see any chance this year, but maybe next year.
In meanwhile I see more hope from private sector- and the world changing in general.]
You know what the bottom line is, it's that space exploration is NOT unimportant.
It never was unimportant.
I refuse to be known as part of the generation that could, but didn't.
Flame » in reply to re: Bowser is scum.
re: Bowser is scum.
The whole thread (31 posts)
- Bowser is scum. (n/t)
- I'd bet you are correct. Maybe for the wrong reason, but still I won't argue with the conclusion.
- re: Bowser is scum.
- I thought this was about him making his dog carry a 20 pound backpack.
- Hmm
- re: Bowser is scum.
- re: Bowser is scum.
- Of course he is not and I'm sure you don't mean it. (n/t)
