If you accept the premise that they can land sufficient supply ships to keep this guy alive for however long, why can't they land a return vehicle ahead of time along with the fuel needed?
The easiest way to do a Mars mission is by setting up both orbital and surface infrastructure in previous unmanned flights (return boosters, landing vehicles in orbit, supply depots/rovers on the surface, you name it) so that basically all you have to send is some people to Mars orbit in a large space capsule. You can take your time getting the preparations to Mars, and if one supply flight fails, you can just repeat it.
Heck, with a little effort you could probably set up a whole orbital Mars space station in the years prior to the manned flight, along with a big ground shelter system.
Needless to say, you could also use this approach on the Moon.
Space/Science » in reply to A One-Way, One-Person Mission to Mars
It seems a bit silly.
The whole thread (39 posts)
- A One-Way, One-Person Mission to Mars
- "Burn the ships!"
- re: A One-Way, One-Person Mission to Mars
- re: A One-Way, One-Person Mission to Mars
- What?!?
- I'd go, in about 10 years time, when my kids are all safe...
- Yeah, I'd go.
- I'd go, in about 10 years time, when my kids are all safe...
- Impossible for a Western society to do.
- re: A One-Way, One-Person Mission to Mars
- That would be a total waste of money even if you assume (?) the human is expendable
- It seems a bit silly.
- Even the Soviet-Union would never have done this!
