I'm aware of the references.
If you recall, the implication in Noeske's work is that there is NO serious questioning by scientists. I don't buy that. I've cited them myself.
I've explained my own current position in previous posts. I am still looking at the information, and see no reason for the blind panic that is gripping so many on this issue.
Nor am I comfortable with the near-religious anger that meets anyone, including scientists, who question the premises at all.
In fact, this entire subject smacks so heavily of religious fervor that it's a bit spooky. Blasphemers are excommunicated. Indulgences can be purchased. There are prophets, and missionaries. Any opposition at all is the work of the devil (oil company funds).
I'd be a lot happier if the scientific "consensus" community came down half as hard on those claiming New York was going to be under ten feet of water as they do those who claim the water isn't going to rise at all. The hysteria is encouraged, and promoted, not judged on its merits or lack thereof.
I read the IPCC reports. Worst case scenarios given in there are nothing approaching what we're being sold in schools, TV specials, and newspaper columns.
I stand by my position that, other than the basic researchers, this entire issue is primarily being used as a political weapon.
Current Events » in reply to TRY you? heck- I was COUNTING on you, TB....
re: TRY you? heck- I was COUNTING on you, TB....
The whole thread (55 posts)
- REPOSTING SINCE I AM TIRED OF THE LIE: "There is no scientific concensus on global warming"
- "There is no scientific concensus on a round earth" was true, too.
- re: REPOSTING SINCE I AM TIRED OF THE LIE: "There is no scientific concensus on global warming"
- re: REPOSTING SINCE I AM TIRED OF THE LIE: "There is no scientific concensus on global warming"
- You want to try me instead?
- TRY you? heck- I was COUNTING on you, TB....
- re: TRY you? heck- I was COUNTING on you, TB....
- Just like I pointed out to McFly...
- Devastating...
- Take that line from Al Gore, did you?
- I took no line from Gore that I can see- Actually, I would prefer he stay out of it.
- Again, that's all you have.
- You have lost it....
- Hard to find few?
- "People at the UN and other scientific bodies are openly talking about making it a criminal offense to speak against man made global warming." Put up or shut-up
- And this.
- Well I can see who didn't read the report I linked to.
- "People at the UN and other scientific bodies" Not them as far as I know.
- "People at the UN and other scientific bodies are openly talking about making it a criminal offense to speak against man made global warming." Put up or shut-up
- "Climate scientists"...
- Hard to find few?
- You have lost it....
- Again, that's all you have.
- I took no line from Gore that I can see- Actually, I would prefer he stay out of it.
- An Absence of evidence argument if I have ever seen one. (n/t)
- TRY you? heck- I was COUNTING on you, TB....
