And I don't forget, either. That wasn't my point. I get sick and tired of Republican talking points as if they're the only ones capable of protecting us from terrorism. No one has been good at it thus far. We're not safer now necessarily. It was 8 years between the two attacks on the WTC. You can't know what they may be up to in their little cells out there.
Bush has damn near destroyed the US as our economy sits in the shitter, our soldiers are still dying in Iraq, the Taliban is making inroads into taking Afghanistan back and our reputation worldwide has never been worse.
Bush is incompetent; 9/11 was on his watch so he and the Republicans have no grounds to say how much better they are at protecting us and that Democrats are soft. I'm a Democrat and I would like to see the Muslim world overseas wiped out. But not at the cost of the United States.
Current Events » in reply to re: IOW...
I know that, too..
The whole thread (33 posts)
- I Worry
- You mean do I think Obama will take our security seriously?
- A lot more seriously than Bush did.
- Why Iraq, why WMDs? Didn't the terrorists use cutters and take off from US airfields? (n/t)
- re: Why Iraq, why WMDs? Didn't the terrorists use cutters and take off from US airfields?
- re: Why Iraq, why WMDs? Didn't the terrorists use cutters and take off from US airfields?
- re: - What excercise? If you mean that no other civilian planes should fly especially around that area, then that makes sense as well as waiting for our armed flyers to see what's what... -Oy. (n/t)
- Prevention
- re: Why Iraq, why WMDs? Didn't the terrorists use cutters and take off from US airfields?
- re: Why Iraq, why WMDs? Didn't the terrorists use cutters and take off from US airfields?
- Bases
- You mean do I think Obama will take our security seriously?
