Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to re: - What excercise? If you mean that no other civilian planes should fly especially around that area, then that makes sense as well as waiting for our armed flyers to see what's what... -Oy.

No, I'm talking about the NORAD Stand Down "Exercises" that morning

>"Wargames Were Cover For the Operational Execution of 9/11"

In what the government describes as a "bizarre coincidence", one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism — it was to be a simulated accident.
(I'm surprised you haven't heard of this.)

>"No single smoking gun has yet been forwarded to explain why air defenses categorically reversed Standard Operating Procedure and failed to respond to hijacked jetliners. Until now. More and more individuals are looking at the facts and highlighting exercise drills that took place on the morning of 9/11.

Cheney: "The orders still stand"
as Flight 77 approaches the Pentagon with no action taken to defend it.

Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta was in the Presidential Emergency Operating Center with Vice President Cheney as Flight 77 approached Washington, D.C.
On May 23, 2003 in front of the 9/11 Commission, Secretary Mineta testified:

"During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, "The plane is 50 miles out." "The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to "the plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the Vice President, "Do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"

As the plane was not shot down, are we to take it that the orders were to LET the plane find its target?

THAT's what I'm talking about.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (33 posts)