re: Different sides of the same coin,
Is a metaphor that comes to mind when reading your excellent post.
Re: "related", and "in any way"
There I was being sarcastic, in answer to your tirade on the word “trinity.â€
You wrote:
- you simply can't seem to grasp what we are saying to you.
From my perspective the observation is similar, in that it is you that can't seem to grasp what I am saying. (“you†is meant in the plural sense to include everyone with similar mindset on this particular subject.)
You wrote:
Your responses always appear to be precomposed, as if you can't wait for us to finish talking so you can say what you had planned on saying anyway, regardless of our attempts to persuade you.
It is interesting that I get a similar feeling from your answers to me.
As for the “attempts to persuade,†you would have better luck if you could understand my viewpoint and then would take the time to explain where or how I make the errors in my assumptions.
How about if we try something radical for HZ.
I’ll answer your questions of
“what do you mean by "mass", "space" and "energy"?â€â€œ
I’ll do it in very small increments, that way we can work out the fine points of the increment without confusing the totality of the issue.
I’ll start with the word space.
My “observations and theoretical structure†of the fundamental meaning of the word “space†is: A three dimensional area that has nothing in it.
Expressed mathematically: S = D3
Where S = Space, D = Distance. In other words; a distance raised to the third power.
Can we agree or disagree on this one point first?