I find our computer climate models to have little predictive value, they produce an enormous range of temperature predictions that most of them must be wrong, only one (if that) might be correct.
Far superior are our physical models, it's wonderful to see the Internatonal Space Station planning to install a water recycling system. Next we need plants to recycle CO2 and wastes to make food and air. Some day, when we can sustain life in orbit, we will start to know something practical about environmental and climate models.
Let's not get carried away by computer animations, we need real, good, physical models before we can pretend to know anything about complex systems like climate.
Space/Science » in reply to Lies, Opinions and a Few Facts about AGW
re: Lies, Opinions and a Few Facts about AGW
The whole thread (61 posts)
- Lies, Opinions and a Few Facts about AGW
- Btw, a must see
- re: Lies, Opinions and a Few Facts about AGW
- Back HERE, actually -- corrected HZ ink
- The H20 - 95% myth is proof that the cited info is nonsense
- The H20 - 95% myth, What About Sublimation
- You need to read more carefully
- by volume, not effect...
- A runaway greenhouse effect is quite unlikely.
- re: A runaway greenhouse effect is quite unlikely.
- Thanks
- re: A runaway greenhouse effect is quite unlikely.
- A few degrees isn't going to do anything
- re: You need to read more carefully
- re: Lies, Opinions and a Few Facts about AGW
- So AGW is a right-wing conspiracy?
- re: Lies, Opinions and a Few Facts about AGW
- re: Lies, Opinions and a Few Facts about AGW
