If mankind lives on several worlds, all kinds of reasons exist for those mankinds to wage wars against each other (one of them being the "Right to be where they went versus the other's lack of that right").
Multiple worlds could shorten civilisation's life span far more than of we were living on one world.
Living on one world means being forced to compromise, accept the others and try to live together for the benefit of our children. That sustainable civilzation could take us very far!
Besides, we don't inhabit the oceans. Why would we want to inhabit other planets?
There's still a lot of room on Earth AND there's also room for sustainable ideas and technologies that will let us evolve and expand our knowledge of the Earth, the Universe and ourselves.
Space/Science » in reply to This is how Nature forces us to colonize space
One world or several worlds
The whole thread (32 posts)
- Did Our Cosmos Exist Before The Big Bang?
- On medication since 11 years old due to these kind of questions (n/t)
- Does dark energy bring back the cyclical Universe idea?
- re: Where else would the mass come from? (n/t)
- I can't get over the luxury of those considerations.
- Unfortunately, throughout his entire history,
- re: throughout his entire history,
- re: throughout his entire history,
- Individuals were accountable and society was protected from human nature.
- re: throughout his entire history,
- Technological civilization's requirements trump the tribes'
- This is how Nature forces us to colonize space
- One world or several worlds
- Won't happen in this iteration.
- re: throughout his entire history,
- re: throughout his entire history,
- Unfortunately, throughout his entire history,