...Certainly the Rich are Each Individually worth many of the Lesser Classes. Any who doubt this may Ask the Rich, and They will tell you.
Thus, when engaged in cold-blooded calculation about who to eat next, the Principle of Least Harm binds us to consume the Rich first, because consumption of one Rich Person spares the consumption of many more of the Lesser classes. It simply stands to reason.
How many of these Lesser Individuals would be thus spared? That is, what is the relative nutritional value of eating the Rich? This is easily and objectively computed. For example, the average CEO is reported to take down some 400 times the income of a Worker, and so when we eat a CEO we spare 400 Workers!
To generalize this principle, we should eat the Rich in order of Net Worth. Wouldn't that be an incentive to charitable giving! Makes the inheritance tax look like a tickle coercion-wise by comparison.
Huzzah! Certainly this a worthy goal to which we as a society may aspire!
Off Topic » in reply to Quoting the banking system we just bailed out.
An Immodest Proposal
