Off Topic » in reply to re: Hardly.

The whole thread (46 posts)

• Climate 'denial' is now a mental disorder - S - 3/10/2009 8:25:34 PM
  • If enough people believe anything it's considered "normal". - Bowser - 3/11/2009 10:44:27 AM
    • The problem is that almost all consideration of global warming is VERY short-term. - David F Mayer - 3/12/2009 10:45:10 PM
      • re: The problem - S - 3/26/2009 7:53:58 PM
    • The Null Hypothesis - S - 3/11/2009 8:54:28 PM
      • And what is there that says there are drivers to keep the current conditions are stable? - Bowser - 3/11/2009 10:25:23 PM
        • There is no permanent stasis in Nature - S - 3/12/2009 8:26:17 PM
          • I didn't say it very well. - Bowser - 3/15/2009 1:27:05 AM
    • Falsification of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect - S - 3/11/2009 8:05:01 PM
      • Gee, that's odd. - ER - 3/11/2009 10:35:43 PM
        • Well, actually... - Laurie Street - 3/11/2009 11:01:57 PM
          • I didn't want to confuse the poor boy. - ER - 3/12/2009 12:04:09 AM
            • And all this... - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/12/2009 10:11:04 PM
              • re: And all this... - ER - 3/12/2009 10:42:03 PM
                • Hardly. - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/13/2009 12:32:30 AM
                  • re: Hardly. - ER - 3/13/2009 3:02:05 AM
                    • Hey Mr. S.... - Jody - 3/15/2009 2:35:59 PM
                      • re: Hey Mr. S.... - S - 3/26/2009 7:45:17 PM
            • Yes, I suppose that was insensitive of me. (n/t) - Laurie Street - 3/12/2009 2:28:54 AM
      • So what you are saying is... - Laurie Street - 3/11/2009 9:16:17 PM
        • Threadbare argument - S - 3/11/2009 9:44:58 PM
          • I don't even know where to start... (n/t) - Laurie Street - 3/11/2009 11:02:55 PM
            • Perhaps with my first question - S - 3/12/2009 7:43:31 PM
              • No. Next? (n/t) - Tony - 3/12/2009 8:03:39 PM
                • And also... - S - 3/12/2009 8:53:59 PM
                  • Show me the conclusive physics/models that show increasing "greenhouse gasses" produces no "greenhouse effect" (n/t) - Tony - 3/13/2009 12:16:34 PM
                  • Good luck. For AGW there aint no such animal as falsification. ;-) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/12/2009 10:06:26 PM
                    • Bingo. - TB - 3/13/2009 5:23:20 PM
                      • Well said - S - 3/26/2009 7:59:44 PM
                      • Once Upon a Time... - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/14/2009 1:27:13 AM
                      • CO2 vs temperature - Laurie Street - 3/13/2009 8:36:37 PM
                      • Ice graphs to present - Laurie Street - 3/13/2009 8:21:17 PM
                        • It's the mean calculation that stops at 2000, not the data. (n/t) - TB - 3/13/2009 10:55:32 PM
                          • I don't understand what you're saying - ER - 3/13/2009 11:39:50 PM
                            • re: I don't understand what you're saying - TB - 3/14/2009 12:45:01 AM
                              • You obviously don't understand what a linear regression is. - ER - 3/14/2009 2:08:15 AM
                                • I think I see the source of your confusion - ER - 3/14/2009 2:39:27 AM
                                  • re: I think I see the source of your confusion - ER - 3/14/2009 2:46:57 AM
                                    • re: confusion - TB - 3/14/2009 4:15:28 PM
                                      • fusion confusion - ER - 3/14/2009 5:16:28 PM
                                        • Average - TB - 3/14/2009 6:25:12 PM
                            • A better link to the graph in question - ER - 3/13/2009 11:56:46 PM
                • Oh? - S - 3/12/2009 8:51:28 PM
                  • try looking @ more than a decade - tony - 3/12/2009 10:56:20 PM
  • It's not a mental disorder. They know exactly what they're doing. (n/t) - ER - 3/11/2009 2:07:02 AM
  • Not surprising. - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/11/2009 1:30:19 AM