No. Next?

Off Topic » in reply to Perhaps with my first question

No. Next?

Tony — 3/12/2009 8:03:39 PM (archived)

The whole thread (46 posts)

Climate 'denial' is now a mental disorder - S - 3/10/2009 8:25:34 PM
- If enough people believe anything it's considered "normal". - Bowser - 3/11/2009 10:44:27 AM
  - The problem is that almost all consideration of global warming is VERY short-term. - David F Mayer - 3/12/2009 10:45:10 PM
    - re: The problem - S - 3/26/2009 7:53:58 PM
  - The Null Hypothesis - S - 3/11/2009 8:54:28 PM
    - And what is there that says there are drivers to keep the current conditions are stable? - Bowser - 3/11/2009 10:25:23 PM
      - There is no permanent stasis in Nature - S - 3/12/2009 8:26:17 PM
        
        I didn't say it very well. - Bowser - 3/15/2009 1:27:05 AM
  - Falsification of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect - S - 3/11/2009 8:05:01 PM
    - Gee, that's odd. - ER - 3/11/2009 10:35:43 PM
      - Well, actually... - Laurie Street - 3/11/2009 11:01:57 PM
        
        I didn't want to confuse the poor boy. - ER - 3/12/2009 12:04:09 AM
        
        And all this... - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/12/2009 10:11:04 PM
        
        re: And all this... - ER - 3/12/2009 10:42:03 PM
        
        Hardly. - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/13/2009 12:32:30 AM
        
        re: Hardly. - ER - 3/13/2009 3:02:05 AM
        
        Hey Mr. S.... - Jody - 3/15/2009 2:35:59 PM
        
        re: Hey Mr. S.... - S - 3/26/2009 7:45:17 PM
        
        Yes, I suppose that was insensitive of me. (n/t) - Laurie Street - 3/12/2009 2:28:54 AM
    - So what you are saying is... - Laurie Street - 3/11/2009 9:16:17 PM
      - Threadbare argument - S - 3/11/2009 9:44:58 PM
        
        I don't even know where to start... (n/t) - Laurie Street - 3/11/2009 11:02:55 PM
        
        Perhaps with my first question - S - 3/12/2009 7:43:31 PM
        
        No. Next? (n/t) - Tony - 3/12/2009 8:03:39 PM
        
        And also... - S - 3/12/2009 8:53:59 PM
        
        Show me the conclusive physics/models that show increasing "greenhouse gasses" produces no "greenhouse effect" (n/t) - Tony - 3/13/2009 12:16:34 PM
        
        Good luck. For AGW there aint no such animal as falsification. ;-) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/12/2009 10:06:26 PM
        
        Bingo. - TB - 3/13/2009 5:23:20 PM
        
        Well said - S - 3/26/2009 7:59:44 PM
        
        Once Upon a Time... - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/14/2009 1:27:13 AM
        
        CO2 vs temperature - Laurie Street - 3/13/2009 8:36:37 PM
        
        Ice graphs to present - Laurie Street - 3/13/2009 8:21:17 PM
        
        It's the mean calculation that stops at 2000, not the data. (n/t) - TB - 3/13/2009 10:55:32 PM
        
        I don't understand what you're saying - ER - 3/13/2009 11:39:50 PM
        
        re: I don't understand what you're saying - TB - 3/14/2009 12:45:01 AM
        
        You obviously don't understand what a linear regression is. - ER - 3/14/2009 2:08:15 AM
        
        I think I see the source of your confusion - ER - 3/14/2009 2:39:27 AM
        
        re: I think I see the source of your confusion - ER - 3/14/2009 2:46:57 AM
        
        re: confusion - TB - 3/14/2009 4:15:28 PM
        
        fusion confusion - ER - 3/14/2009 5:16:28 PM
        
        Average - TB - 3/14/2009 6:25:12 PM
        
        A better link to the graph in question - ER - 3/13/2009 11:56:46 PM
        
        Oh? - S - 3/12/2009 8:51:28 PM
        
        try looking @ more than a decade - tony - 3/12/2009 10:56:20 PM
- It's not a mental disorder. They know exactly what they're doing. (n/t) - ER - 3/11/2009 2:07:02 AM
- Not surprising. - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/11/2009 1:30:19 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (46 posts)