“A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence”. - David Hume
It is irrational to draw conclusions without evidence. Your post is merely an appeal to irrationality and as such must be rejected by reasonable minds. You choose to reject the simple, prosaic explanations because you revel in the mysterious.
You wish to make the rationally comprehensible into the mysterious.
Science takes the opposite attitude and seeks to render the mysterious into the rationally comprehensible. In short, your attitude is anti-scientific. That is why I reject it.