>"The burden of proof is on those who must postulate an entire complex external to ours in order to satisfy their theories. "
I'm sure that's what the church said to Galileo too. Your thinking is the same.
Did you watch the documentary? Can you explain why MI5 and the MOD is so wrapped up in support of the hoaxers? Ever been IN a crop circle? Ever read ALL the extensive reports? Know any serious researchers? (See, you don't really know what you're talking about)
You guys have this tendency to find a simple explanation for yourselves, yet you refuse to look at the other side of the coin, the truly anomalous or impossible circles. Oh, and what about 4,000 circles in 50 countries, some of them going waay back before the hoaxing started? And where is the PROOF that all 4,000 of these are done by the likes of Rob Irving or John Lundberg?
Off Topic » in reply to "Crop Circles--the Hidden Truth" (originally from Mysteries of the Multiverse)
Re: Re: Burden of Proof
The whole thread (24 posts)
- "Crop Circles--the Hidden Truth" (originally from Mysteries of the Multiverse)
- Re: "Crop Circles--the Hidden Truth"
- "Foggiest" idea?
- And where is the PROOF that all 4,000 of these are done by the likes of Rob Irving or John Lundberg?
- Re: Re: Re: Burden of Proof
- Re: Re: Burden of Proof
- Re: Burden of Proof
- Smithsonian Magazine
- Crop Circles: The Art of the Hoax--Smithsonian Magazine
- And you need to open your mind up just a bit
- You Need More Skepticism, Much More Skepticism!
- A case for a double O