You'd do better to stick to what I said than to attack the fictional me you seem to carry around in your head.

I never promised you "racial hate speech" or "anti-Semitism", though as for "the like", we've gone over the anti-Liberalism that's so reminiscent of anti-Semitism in its insane virulency. You'll find a full measure of that kind of hateful bigotry at TPN.

It took me multiple reads to decipher that paragraph about guns. So you're actually saying that you did see the pictures of weapons, aren't you? You weren't going to confirm that, I'll bet; you seem only to want to argue against strawmen like the nonexistent antisemitism.

But on a more serious note, what is that bullshit about "Liberals burning books to protest 1st amendment violations"? If I were an alien trying to parse that sentence armed only with a dictionary it would be mere gibberish, but to one who actually lives on this planet it's pathological insanity.

And your very next words accuse me of being delusional.

Rob, you should seek professional help.

.

BTW, I notice you're still talking about the tea party movement in the third person. Lots of "they"s in that post. Same with Tom. And yet you're ardent defenders of teapartyism, and your constant "rebuttal" to my observations of tea partiers in the wild is to basically paraphrase Richard Pryor's "who ya gonna believe? Me, or your own lying eyes?" What you basically keep trying to tell me is that the tea party movement is never where I'm looking, it's always somewhere else. It's never those embarrasing fat old people in lawn chairs; somewhere else, we're told, is a perky young suburban housewife who's taken up the cudgel of rightwing revolution.

There are millions of tea partiers, and they're all invisible!! Aiiiieeee!!!