Re: When What You Want To Believe Interferes With Reading
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0004F43C-DC1A-1C6E-84A9809EC588EF21&catID=2
Obviously a political not scientific article, is that best you got?
"Adresses most of the misinformation about computer model uncertainty spouted here."
Yeah, right. The wealth of information was staggering.
"Your other questions were already answered."
Nope. I've seen more evidence that witches should be burnt at the stake then what is offered in that article.
"I also love your logic that if climate is already warming naturally we should just add fuel to the fire."
Of course, that's not my logic. You are simply lying again.