Current Events » in reply to Not really ambassadors but representatives

The whole thread (19 posts)

• Carter set up? - Bowser - 5/14/2002 9:49:45 AM
  • How about...Carrter is a loose cannon and did not get a factual briefing. - ebnelson - 5/14/2002 4:50:32 PM
    • Re: None of this matters . . . - D. Spires - 5/15/2002 1:23:50 PM
      • Agreed. - Bowser - 5/15/2002 5:06:46 PM
        • Re: As far as Waco was concerned . . . - D. Spires - 5/15/2002 9:19:20 AM
          • Briefly. - Bowser - 5/15/2002 1:51:47 PM
      • While I do respect Carter in many ways - ebnelson - 5/15/2002 2:41:09 PM
        • Re: Sorry, Ed -- but . . . - D. spires - 5/15/2002 3:38:39 PM
          • Yes, in that sense we are all ambassadors. - ebnelson - 5/15/2002 4:44:45 PM
            • Re: Without 'formal charges', Ed . . . - D. Spires - 5/15/2002 8:59:18 AM
              • I stand corrected, Dan. - ebnelson - 5/15/2002 9:20:39 AM
          • Not really ambassadors but representatives - Larry J - 5/15/2002 4:13:18 PM
            • Re: Sorry about that . . . - D. Spires - 5/15/2002 4:22:01 PM
      • Re: None of this matters . . . - p - 5/15/2002 2:02:40 PM
      • Yes indeed - FrankC - 5/15/2002 12:46:27 PM
        • Presidency - Bowser - 5/15/2002 5:50:30 PM
    • I'm betting he heard through the grapevine that even Bill Clinton wouldn't go to Cuba - Scott - 5/15/2002 12:59:00 PM
  • Re: There was limited available data . . . - D. Spires - 5/14/2002 10:10:28 AM
    • You're right, that IS a fine line. - Bowser - 5/14/2002 2:56:05 PM