The question remains, how do you know he wasn't involved?

Current Events » in reply to How do I know anyone wasn't? Are you one of the 51%? n/t

The question remains, how do you know he wasn't involved?

Larry J — 9/26/2002 9:42:41 AM (archived)

You seem quite certain that he wasn't involved. Me, I have no idea. How are you so certain he wasn't involved? Are you just accepting that idea as a matter of faith or do you have some credible sources?

The whole thread (36 posts)

Feinstein callers oppose war on Iraq by a wide margin - Splinx - 9/26/2002 2:35:59 PM
- UPDATE: 44.8 to 1 against war - Splinx - 9/26/2002 4:53:58 PM
  - Polls - Lindy - 9/26/2002 4:50:55 PM
- Re: Feinstein callers oppose war on Iraq - Tom Brosz - 9/26/2002 4:17:34 PM
  - So where does this "70% favor" number come from, that's been quoted around here? n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 9/26/2002 4:28:09 PM
    - Re: That was from me, and one (1) time . . . - D. Spires - 9/26/2002 7:53:10 PM
    - Different polls, different weeks, different numbers - Larry J - 9/26/2002 5:36:58 PM
      - Thanks for the links - alcaray - 9/26/2002 5:55:12 PM
        
        How do you know he wasn't? - Larry J - 9/26/2002 6:02:17 PM
        
        Re: How do you know he wasn't? - Splinx - 9/26/2002 7:06:15 PM
        
        And who is John Pilger and how would he know? - Larry J - 9/26/2002 9:40:28 AM
        
        He's a second rate Noam Chomsky - Gary - 9/26/2002 5:07:45 PM
        
        Re: John Pilger, NY Times, CIA - Splinx - 9/26/2002 11:39:37 AM
        
        How do I know anyone wasn't? Are you one of the 51%? n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 9/26/2002 8:34:06 AM
        
        The question remains, how do you know he wasn't involved? - Larry J - 9/26/2002 9:42:41 AM
        
        Good grief! Are you serious? - alcaray - 9/26/2002 10:08:52 AM
        
        You're stooping to a new low ... - Larry J - 9/27/2002 1:10:14 PM
        
        Re: ;^) - D. Spires - 9/27/2002 2:35:33 PM
        
        Re: Hardly McCarthyism (& Co) . . . - D. Spires - 9/26/2002 11:25:11 AM
        
        Well - alcaray - 9/27/2002 3:55:49 PM
        
        Re: As I've stated many times, 9-11 is not the issue, and Hussein remains guilty of 'great crimes' against humanity . . . - D. Spires - 9/27/2002 4:10:25 PM
        
        These are much better reasons for attacking Iraq. But they aren't what we were talking about. n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 9/27/2002 4:26:39 PM
        
        Re: No, it went off on a pointless tangent . . . - D. Spires - 9/27/2002 4:33:34 PM
        
        You really think 51% of Americans... - alcaray - 9/27/2002 5:32:54 PM
        
        Re: Still . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 9/27/2002 5:51:59 PM
        
        As opposed to Barbara Striesand's spelling, which seems to be fascinating. n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 9/27/2002 6:30:15 PM
        
        Re: I said it was 'sadly funny' . . . - D. Spires - 9/27/2002 6:45:53 PM
        
        If bin Ladin asked Sadam for help would Sadam have given help? - Scott - 9/26/2002 10:26:30 AM
        
        Interjection Here - Lindy - 9/26/2002 4:35:28 PM
        
        Re: Probably because the left would have already shot him . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 9/27/2002 12:53:13 PM
        
        So to keep America from attacking... - alcaray - 9/26/2002 11:09:09 AM
        
        Re: Involvement don't enter into it . . . - D. Spires - 9/26/2002 11:29:10 AM
- Re: Feinstein callers oppose war on Iraq by a wide margin - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/26/2002 2:46:50 PM
  - fatigue - McFly - 9/26/2002 4:00:41 PM
    - Insanity or InSaddamCity? - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/26/2002 4:08:10 PM
      - LOL...I rest my case :-) n/t (n/t) - McFly - 9/26/2002 4:38:20 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (36 posts)