I was thinking of gun deaths on an annual basis, but Saddam's death toll is over a long period as well so its a fair comparison if you take away the half for suicide for which there are many alternatives. You'd also have to take away a sizable fraction of the murders which were planned rather than the result of robberies as there are many other alternatives as well if your justification were simply legal gun use. Still you would come away with somethinbg of a similar magnitude over the long term.
However, you totally ignore the democracy angle. Are you guys against democracy too? The US has not cliamed a will to "liberate" people from their democratically established laws. This is the strawman of strawmen arguments in my opinion. Totaly ludicrously related to the situation at hand.
Regards,
Mark
Current Events » in reply to Not so ridiculous
Still Ridiculous
The whole thread (32 posts)
- Top Ten Dumb Anti-War Comments
- Re: Top Ten Dumb Anti-War Comments
- Top Ten Dumb Right Wing Fallacies and Strawmen
- Fallacies
- Re: Top Ten Dumb Right Wing Fallacies and Strawmen
