<The data to date, suggests that Iraq did, indeed, dismantle large quantities of its weapons of mass destruction.
Then why the hell didn't they prove it?
During the U.N. inspections, Iraq was behaving exactly like they were hiding large amounts of contraband.
Restricting access, turning in crappy paperwork, failing to come up with any evidence of the destruction of their WMD, threatening scientists with death, etc.
Why?
I theorized (no proof) that the upper echelons of Iraq may have been fooled by their weapons people, who feared the consequences of failure, into thinking they had a lot of weapons they didn't, and the upper echelons behaved accordingly.
Anyone have a better theory?
Current Events » in reply to Re: Tests Cast Doubt on Chemical Find
Dismantled weapons
The whole thread (75 posts)
- Tests Cast Doubt on Chemical Find in Iraq . . .
- Re: Tests Cast Doubt on Chemical Find
- Not unexpected
- Thanks Don
- Re: Not unexpected
- Please post any links showing short lifespans
- I had earlier...a couple of times
- The moving agenda.
- I am unmoved
- Re: The moving agenda.
- Whose moving agenda?
- Well lets just forget about the banned scud missiles
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Got a source?
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Again, what is your support and/or proof?
- Here is another one
- Re: Again, what is your support and/or proof?
- Hmmm, And will Fox News be right this time?
- Talk about grasping at straws...
- Again, what is your support and/or proof?
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Whose moving agenda?
- The moving agenda.
- I had earlier...a couple of times
