The Bush administration's case was based upon the assertion that Iraq had not accounted for large quantities of chemical weapons it had manufactured prior to the first Gulf War. Here is what the CIA reported in January, 1991 about Iraq's chemical weapons:
""Iraq is not able to make good-quality chemical agents. Technical failures have reduced their purity and caused problems in storage and handling. This is a particular problem for the sarin- type nerve agents (GB and GF). These both contain hydrofluoricacid (HF), an impurity that attacks metal surfaces and catalyzes nerve agent decomposition. This leads to metal failure and leaks in the ammunition, increasing handling hazards. [...] Lower purity significantly limits shelf life and reduces toxic effects when the munition is employed. [...] The nerve agent should have already begun to deteriorate, and decomposition should make most of the nerve agent weapons unserviceable by the end of March 1991."
And here is UNSCOM's more recent assessment in March, 2003:
"According to documents discovered by UNSCOM in Iraq, the purity of Sarin-type agents produced by Iraq were on average below 60%, and dropped below Iraq’s established quality control acceptance level of 40% by purity some 3 to 12 months after production. [...] There is no evidence that any bulk Sarin-type agents remain in Iraq - gaps in accounting of these agents are related to Sarin-type agents weaponized in rocket warheads and aerial bombs. Based on the documentation found by UNSCOM during inspections in Iraq, Sarin-type agents produced by Iraq were largely of low quality and as such, degraded shortly after production. Therefore, with respect to the unaccounted for weaponized Sarin-type agents, it is unlikely that they would still be viable today."
And here is what UNMOVIC had to say about Iraq's present manufacturing capabilities:
"Iraq does not appear to have a dedicated facility capable of producing Mustard and its key precursors. Significant modifications would be required to convert existing chemical production facilities for this purpose. Iraq would have to utilize “corrosion resistant” equipment (for the processing of the chlorinating agent), which it possesses in limited quantities."
In short, it appears that the American public may have been lied to.
Current Events » in reply to The moving agenda.
I am unmoved
The whole thread (75 posts)
- Tests Cast Doubt on Chemical Find in Iraq . . .
- Re: Tests Cast Doubt on Chemical Find
- Not unexpected
- Thanks Don
- Re: Not unexpected
- Please post any links showing short lifespans
- I had earlier...a couple of times
- The moving agenda.
- I am unmoved
- Re: The moving agenda.
- Whose moving agenda?
- Well lets just forget about the banned scud missiles
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Got a source?
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Again, what is your support and/or proof?
- Here is another one
- Re: Again, what is your support and/or proof?
- Hmmm, And will Fox News be right this time?
- Talk about grasping at straws...
- Again, what is your support and/or proof?
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Whose moving agenda?
- The moving agenda.
- I had earlier...a couple of times
