"The stuff we have so far is just a fraction of millions of files that have yet to be examined."
and
"You could have Imax film of Saddam and Osama having sex at a flight school and they still wouldn't pay attention."
Tom, so far you folks have thrown out here is nothing- not even enough to indict the proverbial ham sandwich. Nobody here thinks Saddam is anything other than a vile Jackal- however, I am starting to doubt that we will find WMD... And remember- I was a believer in WMD before this war.
The terrorist connections are as substantial as smoke. You are not getting ANYWHERE on that matter.
Snide claims to the contrary do NOT convince, nor should they convince reasonable people. The burden of proof is on the US.
This is not the era of witchtrials and hysteria, this is the/should be the age of reason. I want fact and proof. I don't see any.
Or are we going to also allow homeopathy, moral relativism and faith healing? There is anecdotal evidence for these that is about as strong as the evidence you and Co. have been throwing around.
Davin
Current Events » in reply to Give it up...
You should say that!
The whole thread (75 posts)
- Tests Cast Doubt on Chemical Find in Iraq . . .
- Re: Tests Cast Doubt on Chemical Find
- Not unexpected
- Thanks Don
- Re: Not unexpected
- Please post any links showing short lifespans
- I had earlier...a couple of times
- The moving agenda.
- I am unmoved
- Re: The moving agenda.
- Whose moving agenda?
- Well lets just forget about the banned scud missiles
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Got a source?
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Again, what is your support and/or proof?
- Here is another one
- Re: Again, what is your support and/or proof?
- Hmmm, And will Fox News be right this time?
- Talk about grasping at straws...
- Again, what is your support and/or proof?
- Re: Whose moving agenda?
- Whose moving agenda?
- The moving agenda.
- I had earlier...a couple of times
